Search Criteria
Package Details: superproductivity-bin 13.1.0-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/superproductivity-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | superproductivity-bin |
Description: | ToDo list and Time Tracking |
Upstream URL: | http://super-productivity.com/ |
Licenses: | MIT |
Conflicts: | superproductivity, superproductivity-git |
Provides: | superproductivity |
Submitter: | alosarjos |
Maintainer: | alosarjos (johannesjo) |
Last Packager: | johannesjo |
Votes: | 32 |
Popularity: | 2.73 |
First Submitted: | 2020-10-26 19:09 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-06-17 18:51 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR)
- nss (nss-hgAUR)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »
thea commented on 2024-11-08 10:43 (UTC) (edited on 2024-11-08 10:43 (UTC) by thea)
@tovo I tried to understand the AUR rules of submission [1] and did a comment as stated
I also wrote the maintainer an email. Is there a better way to do ? I used the package repo, but am unsure how to propose the changes.
tovo commented on 2024-11-08 10:33 (UTC)
Thanks @thea,
Did you made a submit request to integrate your corrections?
thea commented on 2024-11-08 07:41 (UTC)
As @manzu said 10.1.1-2 failed for me too.
I fixed the PKGBUILD with
manzu commented on 2024-11-08 03:44 (UTC)
Getting the following error.
Joey5403 commented on 2024-11-07 08:15 (UTC)
package path is change from /opt/superProductivity/ to /opt/Super Productivity/
will not create the softlink
siliconmeadow commented on 2024-11-07 08:06 (UTC)
Hi @alosarjos, I didn't know there was a
PKGBUILD_template
in the upstream repo. It seems to me that if only Arch Linux uses that template, it's useless to maintain both that file upstream and this repo.Also, I really think you should consider doing some kind of checksum on the file to show that someone has properly audited the new release at a very basic level.
alosarjos commented on 2024-11-07 06:13 (UTC)
I fixed it, and have provided a merge request to the upstream repo to fix this, but they have just released a new version without merging those changes an that's why it's broken again...
siliconmeadow commented on 2024-11-06 23:29 (UTC) (edited on 2024-11-06 23:31 (UTC) by siliconmeadow)
How about keeping the licence details and also validating the sha256sums?
This worked for me.
SoftExpert commented on 2024-11-06 22:16 (UTC)
You reverted the change for retrieving the DEB package and the path is again incorrect. This is the current path:
https://github.com/johannesjo/super-productivity/releases/download/v10.1.1/superProductivity-amd64.deb
There is no longer a version number in the file name.
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »