Search Criteria
Package Details: svgo 3.0.2-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/svgo.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | svgo |
Description: | Tool for optimizing SVG files |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/svg/svgo |
Licenses: | MIT |
Conflicts: | nodejs-svgo |
Provides: | nodejs-svgo |
Replaces: | nodejs-svgo |
Submitter: | flacks |
Maintainer: | alerque |
Last Packager: | alerque |
Votes: | 32 |
Popularity: | 0.039954 |
First Submitted: | 2018-07-24 18:35 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-12-20 17:44 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
Required by (7)
- discourse (requires nodejs-svgo) (optional)
- image_optim (requires nodejs-svgo)
- image_optim-git (requires nodejs-svgo) (optional)
- libreoffice-style-yaru-fullcolor (make)
- makepkg-optimize (optional)
- makepkg-optimize-mold (optional)
- ttf-twemoji-color-git (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
alerque commented on 2021-08-18 05:13 (UTC)
@Tjuh That looks like something is wrong with your system, not this package. I compiled this the other day and just did it again now to check. In a clean chroot using
makechrootpkg
this builds just fine (if you want a really easy way to build that way install devtools then runextra-x86_64-build
instead ofmakepkg
to build). As for your system, perhaps reinstall npm / nodejs?Tjuh commented on 2021-08-17 23:20 (UTC)
Won't build;
simon04 commented on 2021-03-27 09:36 (UTC)
Thanks, fixed in 2.2.2-2 (what a lucky number) – https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=svgo&id=5c5bc629b2cd8662125731d1e1840c3008387431
eugene commented on 2021-03-23 16:16 (UTC)
npm install
line should not have--user root
as new guidelines suggestflipflop97 commented on 2021-03-23 14:42 (UTC)
@1ace
Same issue with package
semver
1ace commented on 2021-03-20 11:18 (UTC)
This package installs a bunch of files in
/usr/lib/node_modules/root/
(as well as the normal/usr/lib/node_modules/svgo/
), which conflicts withvscode-html-languageserver
for instance as that package tries to do the same; I'm not sure if this "root" module is really a thing that should be installed ("root" may very well be a placeholder name), but I'm guessing neither packages should be doing this :)PanisSupraOmnia commented on 2019-04-25 20:36 (UTC) (edited on 2019-04-25 20:44 (UTC) by PanisSupraOmnia)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but shouldn't the
npm install
line have--user root
passed to it, per the Arch wiki? The current PKGBUILD causes the files to be owned by the installing user.Edit: Also, you specify that the license is MIT; however, Arch takes MIT as a special case of a custom license, in that you need to install the license in the PKGBUILD because it has a copyright line. See the Arch wiki for details. I happened to notice these issues because I ran
namcap
on the package.tensor5 commented on 2018-02-09 17:05 (UTC)
I've seen this issue in other npm packages, it didn't show up in my build though.
Calimero commented on 2018-02-09 14:35 (UTC) (edited on 2018-02-09 14:39 (UTC) by Calimero)
I wanted to ask for a fix of the permission issues: there are lots of files and directories with mode 777. But installing a second time fixes that, I'm not sure what's happening.
tensor5 commented on 2017-11-17 10:51 (UTC)
1 2 Next › Last »