Arch Linux User Repository

@mluque Yes, it seems that Microsoft is doing the wrong thing and has deleted the packages from the repository. There are several open threads on this topic.

The truth is that since the announcement that Microsoft was going to withdraw the Teams client, one does not know what is going to happen. I hope they restore the files, but in the meantime I have uploaded the binaries here (they are the Arch packages, I don't have the original .deb packages but if someone passes them to me I can include them).

Please, before flag as Out-of-date perform a double check in versions. Version 1.4.00.4855 is higher than 1.3.00.30857, 1.3.00.5153 or 1.3.00.958.

If you doubt, please remember the math classes and perform a count 1, 2, 3, 4, ..., 958, 959, ..., 5152, 5153, 5154, ..., 30856, 30857, 30858, etc.

You can go to HERE, download DEB or RPM and compare versions

@muflone, the package that is a duplicate of ms-teams is https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/teams-insiders/ that is a different version of teams only for insider users. This package is the open one, I think that both packages must exist since are differents versions.

I added @jvybihal as co-maintainer in both packages, this and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/teams-insiders/

@jvybihal I think that names must be teams and teams-insiders as original ones. People find this package before ms-teams because enter teams word in search box and suggest this one.

@jvybihal I think the teams name suits better. You could co-maintain it along with @ogarcia

Then we can delete the ms-teams package

I agree that the duplicates need to merge into one. I contacted @ogarcia about a month ago with PRQ#16712. He suggested keeping name teams-insiders - which kind of makes sense, because it's the naming MS uses, but I (as some others) like ms-teams much better. So I decided not to argue and let it be, without reply - I knew my package was not originally aimed for the insiders version, I just wanted to create the ground for official release once it came out. And now it did, and I switched my package to it.

It is beyond my understanding why we have 3 packages of the same thing now, and what is the reasoning behind it.

Anyway, I like ms-teams name, but I don't care too much about it, so merging everything into 'teams' is fine with me, if others like it better. I can co-maintain it, but I do not insist on it.

Works fine to me. The only issue that I have so far is the auto-correction and the spell check is not working any more. Any other here with the same issue?

@ogarcia this package is a duplicate of https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/ms-teams/ which was created 3 months ago, while this package was created yesterday

we have to make a choice here:

1- this package will be removed and ms-teams will keep the previous name

2- you let the ms-team package to take this package and we can merge ms-teams into teams

Chrome installs certificates user-wide (I believe the location was ~/.pki), this might be the reason Teams can see your company certificate.

I don't think so, as I don't have any chrome/chromium installed in my laptop since I re-installed with Arch... Also nothing written here in the dependencies?

Does "teams" on gnu+linux depends on chromium/chrome, or at least reads chromium/chrome settings somehow? If a dependency, should it be included as such?

See, I authenticated for the company account, and it rejected me since I don't have double authentication, but after adding my personal company certificate to chromium, it just worked. Which makes me suspect whether teams is using chromium/chrome to authenticate, or it uses its setting given it's sort of based on chromium/chrome...

Works great!

Thanks, seems to work like a charm here! :)