Search Criteria
Package Details: texlab-bin 5.20.0-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/texlab-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | texlab-bin |
| Description: | A cross-platform implementation of the Language Server Protocol for LaTeX |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/latex-lsp/texlab |
| Licenses: | GPL-3.0 |
| Conflicts: | texlab, texlab-git |
| Provides: | texlab |
| Submitter: | coxackie |
| Maintainer: | coxackie |
| Last Packager: | coxackie |
| Votes: | 2 |
| Popularity: | 0.160206 |
| First Submitted: | 2023-09-04 11:29 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-10-08 09:10 (UTC) |
Dependencies (1)
- gcc-libs (gcc-libs-gitAUR, gccrs-libs-gitAUR, gcc11-libsAUR, gcc-libs-snapshotAUR)
Required by (4)
- helix-ext (requires texlab) (optional)
- kate-git (requires texlab) (optional)
- kate-root (requires texlab) (optional)
- tree-sitter-bibtex-git (requires texlab) (optional)
Latest Comments
coxackie commented on 2023-12-03 15:49 (UTC)
@PerilousBooklet apologies for misunderstanding, but in this case the correct way to ask is "Anyone else updated ... ?" With "Someone else ... " the meaning is different. Anyway, glad it now works for you.
PerilousBooklet commented on 2023-12-03 11:50 (UTC) (edited on 2023-12-03 13:57 (UTC) by PerilousBooklet)
@coxackie Read my question again, I simply asked if someone else other than me also had a validity check problem, I did not imply that "someone else" messed up. Also, thanks to your advice I deleted the cached directory and now there are no problems.
coxackie commented on 2023-12-01 22:57 (UTC)
@PerilousBooklet the validity check passes for me in a clean installation. There does not seem to be any problem. Maybe the "someone else" should clear any previous files in the directory?
PerilousBooklet commented on 2023-12-01 17:24 (UTC)
Someone else updated texlab-bin and was greeted with a failed validity check of the tar archive?