Package Details: thinkingrock 2.2.1-7

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: thinkingrock
Description: Java-based GTD application
Upstream URL:
Licenses: CDDL
Submitter: mathieu.clabaut
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: rfnash
Votes: 43
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2007-09-27 13:39 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2015-08-18 17:56 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

NoobAlice commented on 2020-11-27 01:24 (UTC)

2.2.1 is probably the last full version available for free.

Current trial version is available here and current purchasable full version is here. For Java, the developer say "Java 8.x or 7.x is required. Oracle Java 8 is strongly advised."

Website URL redirects to

evorster commented on 2016-07-05 12:12 (UTC)

When I opened this application for the first time, it says that there is a version 3.4.2 available. Unfortunately, the website it's on is currently on Google's dangerous sites list because it's serving malware. Any chances of this package getting an update?

heinrich5991 commented on 2015-08-17 16:55 (UTC)

Doesn't build for me, it says: $ packer -S thinkingrock Dependency `jre6-compat' of `thinkingrock' does not exist.

capoeira commented on 2014-09-27 16:51 (UTC)

working nice now. still the only GTD I found with a good workflow

rfnash commented on 2014-07-25 17:39 (UTC)

I think I've fixed the problem described by capoeira, thanks to the discussion thread he linked. Basically, ThinkingRock needs java6, and jdkhome has to point to an installation of java6. I've added a dependency to a package that provides java6, and changed jdkhome to point to it.

xyproto commented on 2014-02-20 12:05 (UTC)

Since this application is no longer being developed as an open source application (for a few years now), and now seems to be causing problems for some users, I'm disowning it. If it's not adopted for a while, I'll request for it to be deleted on the mailing list.

capoeira commented on 2014-01-27 10:49 (UTC)

if anybody could help, i opened a topic:

capoeira commented on 2014-01-27 09:30 (UTC)

well, that sucks it's not working with openjdk either

xyproto commented on 2014-01-25 12:33 (UTC)

That might be. Have you tried with openjdk?

capoeira commented on 2014-01-25 12:09 (UTC)

look at that. migt be because i'm using JRE?