Package Details: tkimg 1.4.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/tkimg.git (read-only)
Package Base: tkimg
Description: This package enhances Tk, adding support for many other Image formats: BMP, XBM, XPM, GIF, PNG, JPEG, TIFF and postscript.
Upstream URL: http://tkimg.sourceforge.net
Keywords: tk
Licenses: BSD
Submitter: Morn
Maintainer: haawda
Last Packager: haawda
Votes: 15
Popularity: 1.104882
First Submitted: 2015-08-10 15:23
Last Updated: 2015-12-19 10:31

Latest Comments

erk commented on 2018-04-24 15:26

Does not compile errors with: gcc -shared -march=x86-64 -mtune=generic -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector-strong -fno-plt -pipe -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -DNDEBUG -Wall -Wwrite-strings -fPIC -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wl,-O1,--sort-common,--as-needed,-z,relro,-z,now -Wl,--export-dynamic -o libtkimgpixmap1.4.2.so pixmap.o pixmapUnix.o -L/home/erk/aur/tkimg/src/tkimg1.4/base -ltkimgstub1.4.2 -lX11 -L/home/erk/aur/tkimg/src/tkimg1.4/base -ltkimgstub1.4.2 -lX11 -lXss -lXext -lXft -lfontconfig -lpthread -ldl -lz -lpthread -lieee -lm -L/usr/lib -ltclstub8.6 -L/usr/lib -ltkstub8.6 /usr/bin/ld: could not find -lieee collect2: error: ld returned exit code 1

blacktav commented on 2015-09-19 22:59

Yes scid_vs_pc. I can confirm your latest version of scid_vs_pc installs fine without tkimg.

Good job! Thanks

Morn commented on 2015-09-10 15:48

OK, I've disowned this package as I only adopted this for scid_vs_pc in the first place. If someone knows how to fix this build, feel free to adopt.

Morn commented on 2015-09-10 15:38

I could reproduce a build problem after I wiped pkg and src; but for me it stops while building jdmerge.o.

So yes, it looks like tkimg is definitely broken on Arch right now. What are you installing this for, scid_vs_pc? Because I think scid_vs_pc no longer needs tkimg with the latest tcl version.

blacktav commented on 2015-09-10 10:17

Build fails when linking libtifftcl3.9.4.so with
tif_codec.o:(.data.rel+0x118): undefined reference to `TIFFInitJBIG'
and similar
Is our current libtiff4 too recent perhaps?