Package Details: trezor-bridge-bin 2.0.30-4

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: trezor-bridge-bin
Description: Communication daemon for TREZOR
Upstream URL:
Keywords: trezor-bridge trezord
Licenses: LGPL3
Conflicts: trezor-udev, trezord-git, trezord-go
Provides: trezor-bridge, trezor-udev, trezord
Submitter: jugs
Maintainer: pizzaman
Last Packager: pizzaman
Votes: 25
Popularity: 0.000206
First Submitted: 2015-08-07 01:06 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2021-12-10 05:21 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

pizzaman commented on 2021-12-10 05:25 (UTC)

@binarypenguin & @kuroneko trezor-suite-appimage was removed from conflicts.

cga commented on 2021-10-30 10:13 (UTC)

hi everyone,

apologies about being absent, but life's been very busy. As I don't have time to maintain this anymore, I'm orphaning it so that some other skilled maintainer can take over.

peace out!

binarypenguin commented on 2021-10-18 13:49 (UTC) (edited on 2021-10-18 13:50 (UTC) by binarypenguin)

the conflict with trezor-suite-appimage messes up the build.

==> Entering fakeroot environment...
==> Starting package()...
==> Tidying install...
  -> Removing libtool files...
  -> Purging unwanted files...
  -> Removing static library files...
  -> Compressing man and info pages...
==> Checking for packaging issues...
==> Creating package "trezor-suite-appimage"...
  -> Generating .PKGINFO file...
  -> Generating .BUILDINFO file...
  -> Generating .MTREE file...
  -> Compressing package...
==> Leaving fakeroot environment.
==> Finished making: trezor-suite-appimage 21.10.2-1 (Mon 18 Oct 2021 03:43:24 PM CEST)
==> Cleaning up...
:: Pacman command: /usr/bin/sudo /usr/bin/pacman /tmp/xxx/trezor-suite-appimage/trezor-suite-appimage-21.10.2-1-x86_64.pkg.tar.zst -U
loading packages...
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
:: trezor-suite-appimage and trezor-bridge-bin are in conflict. Remove trezor-bridge-bin? [y/N] y
error: failed to prepare transaction (could not satisfy dependencies)
:: unable to satisfy dependency 'trezor-udev' required by trezor-suite-appimage

the problem is that I installed the trezor-bridge-bin when the package did not state that it provides trezor-udev. Is the conflict really necessary?

kuroneko commented on 2021-08-22 03:02 (UTC)

Why is this package conflicts with trezor-suite-appimage?

cga commented on 2021-06-09 17:18 (UTC)

@natlu2809 I'm glad you solved your issue. Let's wait for upstream.

@akeller no time to do that right now. It seems many packages don't do that tho. I'm open to pointers and docs.

@louielu arm64 added with -3 version. let me know if it works please.

akeller commented on 2021-05-28 07:01 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-28 07:02 (UTC) by akeller)

PGP verification could be part of this install. Right now, the package host is a single point of failure, and the only way to double check that the .deb is authentic is to import the PGP key for SatoshiLabs and run dpkg-sig yourself. We could add dpkg-sig as a dependent package (or as a source, since it is part of the git repo). Adding the PGP key could be a pain, but the fingerprint is at least listed on Github.

louielu commented on 2021-05-11 02:46 (UTC)

To support arm64 (e.g. pinebook pro) arch, we can add this to the PKGBUILD:

arch=('i686' 'x86_64' 'aarch64')



natlu2809 commented on 2021-05-09 14:42 (UTC)

to answer my own Q on 2021-04021 16:03 - Trezor support tell me :

"This is an issue with a third-party tool pamu2fcfg. Please keep in mind that we do not develop nor maintain third-party software, so we cannot guarantee their full functionality. However, your private keys are always safely protected by your Trezor device, no matter what third-party application you use it with.

The issue was already fixed ( but was not released yet. It is up to the third party to release the fix."

natlu2809 commented on 2021-04-21 16:03 (UTC)

Tell me to go somewhere else for support but Im having trouble with Trezor Model T and pam authn. pamu2fcfg is giving me an error: error: fido_cred_verify (-7) FIDO_ERR_INVALID_ARGUMENT. Installed this version 2.0.30-2 yesterday.

Any ideas, suggestions?

cga commented on 2021-03-19 10:05 (UTC)


I agree with you on the diff about udev, and I would fix that if I could. However this bin package uses a .deb archive, hence udev rules come from upstream. If this was a source based package I would fix this, but it's not.