Search Criteria
Package Details: trezor-bridge-bin 2.0.30-4
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/trezor-bridge-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | trezor-bridge-bin |
Description: | Communication daemon for TREZOR |
Upstream URL: | https://trezor.io/ |
Keywords: | trezor-bridge trezord |
Licenses: | LGPL3 |
Conflicts: | trezor-udev, trezord-git, trezord-go |
Provides: | trezor-bridge, trezor-udev, trezord |
Submitter: | jugs |
Maintainer: | pizzaman |
Last Packager: | pizzaman |
Votes: | 26 |
Popularity: | 0.061602 |
First Submitted: | 2015-08-07 01:06 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2021-12-10 05:21 (UTC) |
Dependencies (1)
- systemd (systemd-chromiumosAUR, systemd-selinuxAUR, systemd-gitAUR, systemd-fmlAUR)
Required by (5)
- nunchuk-desktop-appimage (requires trezor-udev) (optional)
- python-trezor-agent (requires trezor-udev)
- trezor-suite-appimage (requires trezor-udev)
- trezord-git (requires trezor-udev)
- trezord-go (requires trezor-udev)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »
pizzaman commented on 2021-12-10 05:25 (UTC)
@binarypenguin & @kuroneko trezor-suite-appimage was removed from conflicts.
cga commented on 2021-10-30 10:13 (UTC)
hi everyone,
apologies about being absent, but life's been very busy. As I don't have time to maintain this anymore, I'm orphaning it so that some other skilled maintainer can take over.
peace out!
binarypenguin commented on 2021-10-18 13:49 (UTC) (edited on 2021-10-18 13:50 (UTC) by binarypenguin)
the conflict with
trezor-suite-appimage
messes up the build.the problem is that I installed the trezor-bridge-bin when the package did not state that it provides trezor-udev. Is the conflict really necessary?
kuroneko commented on 2021-08-22 03:02 (UTC)
Why is this package conflicts with trezor-suite-appimage?
cga commented on 2021-06-09 17:18 (UTC)
@natlu2809 I'm glad you solved your issue. Let's wait for upstream.
@akeller no time to do that right now. It seems many packages don't do that tho. I'm open to pointers and docs.
@louielu arm64 added with -3 version. let me know if it works please.
akeller commented on 2021-05-28 07:01 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-28 07:02 (UTC) by akeller)
PGP verification could be part of this install. Right now, the package host is a single point of failure, and the only way to double check that the .deb is authentic is to import the PGP key for SatoshiLabs and run
dpkg-sig
yourself. We could adddpkg-sig
as a dependent package (or as a source, since it is part of the git repo). Adding the PGP key could be a pain, but the fingerprint is at least listed on Github.louielu commented on 2021-05-11 02:46 (UTC)
To support arm64 (e.g. pinebook pro) arch, we can add this to the PKGBUILD:
natlu2809 commented on 2021-05-09 14:42 (UTC)
to answer my own Q on 2021-04021 16:03 - Trezor support tell me :
"This is an issue with a third-party tool pamu2fcfg. Please keep in mind that we do not develop nor maintain third-party software, so we cannot guarantee their full functionality. However, your private keys are always safely protected by your Trezor device, no matter what third-party application you use it with.
The issue was already fixed (https://github.com/Yubico/pam-u2f/issues/176) but was not released yet. It is up to the third party to release the fix."
natlu2809 commented on 2021-04-21 16:03 (UTC)
Tell me to go somewhere else for support but Im having trouble with Trezor Model T and pam authn. pamu2fcfg is giving me an error: error: fido_cred_verify (-7) FIDO_ERR_INVALID_ARGUMENT. Installed this version 2.0.30-2 yesterday.
Any ideas, suggestions?
cga commented on 2021-03-19 10:05 (UTC)
@bradwood,
I agree with you on the diff about udev, and I would fix that if I could. However this bin package uses a .deb archive, hence udev rules come from upstream. If this was a source based package I would fix this, but it's not.
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »