Package Details: trustedqsl 2.7.3-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/trustedqsl.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: trustedqsl
Description: QSO log signing data for the ARRL Logbook of The World (LoTW)
Upstream URL: http://lotw.arrl.org/
Licenses: custom:ARRL
Conflicts: trustedqsl-git
Provides: tqsllib, trustedqsl
Replaces: tqsl
Submitter: jecxjo
Maintainer: not_anonymous
Last Packager: not_anonymous
Votes: 25
Popularity: 1.00
First Submitted: 2011-08-27 23:42 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-12 20:29 (UTC)

Dependencies (5)

Required by (5)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 9 Next › Last »

xiota commented on 2023-09-20 13:22 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-20 15:01 (UTC) by xiota)

Please remove replaces directive to comply with AUR submission guidelines.

ok1dtm commented on 2022-10-05 08:08 (UTC)

Thank you very much and I confirm that the installation of tqsl is now trouble-free

not_anonymous commented on 2022-10-04 21:33 (UTC)

UPDATED ! - Great catch ok1dtm !! Seemingly "overnight" they updated (at least) the auto-notification and INTERNAL version numbering (from 2.6.5.rc4 to 2.6.5) and did NOT update the release number......i.e. The source changed but the version number did NOT, and the code IS definitely different !!!!

Anyways all is better HERE now. Just rerun the updating process. (If this is still a problem for you...please clear the associated cache .)

ok1dtm commented on 2022-10-04 16:30 (UTC)

I have a problem on a second PC with EndeavourOS latest update. Trustedqsl 2.6.5-1cannot be installed with error: ==> Validating source files with md5sums... tqsl-2.6.5.tar.gz ... FAILED trustedqsl.desktop ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! Please what fixed this problem?

ok1dtm commented on 2022-10-02 14:45 (UTC)

Thank you for the update! I didn't know that. Pouze na ARRL webstránce všiml že 2.6.5 byla vydána Sept 10 :"Sep 10, 2022: September 10, 2022: Latest version TQSL (version 2.6.5) is now available --" A big apology

not_anonymous commented on 2022-10-02 04:17 (UTC)

Updated !! ... Received email that this had been "red-flagged" as out of date by neo_chen yesterday (automatic email from aur servers was dated 30-Sept-22 at 9:41 am local time). Approx. 18 hours later ok1dtm commented below a request for the same "out-of-date". <- This is NOT NECCESSARY om when the package is already flagged as out-of date !! BUT THANK YOU ANYWAYS ....hi hi.

ok1dtm commented on 2022-10-01 09:29 (UTC)

Please update to 2.6.5

not_anonymous commented on 2022-07-24 14:00 (UTC)

Updated - tnxs 4 heads up om's.

ok1dtm commented on 2022-07-23 20:20 (UTC)

catdad_fred: thanks problem completely solved

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 9 Next › Last »