Package Details: ttf-agave 37-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/ttf-agave.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ttf-agave
Description: A TrueType monospaced font designed for X environments
Upstream URL: https://alocy.be/page/agave
Licenses: MIT
Provides: ttf-font
Submitter: mikezackles
Maintainer: mikezackles
Last Packager: mikezackles
Votes: 2
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2017-12-30 06:13 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2021-06-04 14:32 (UTC)

Dependencies (2)

Required by (254)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

mikezackles commented on 2021-06-04 14:33 (UTC)

@stylemistake Done! Thanks for pointing that out. Glad you like the font. Been my favorite ever since the original release.

stylemistake commented on 2021-06-04 09:44 (UTC) (edited on 2021-06-04 09:44 (UTC) by stylemistake)

I had the same issue once, this make dependency is neccesary.

Also, if you could, please make it so that the download name for the font (source) contained a version number. When using a persistent cache folder for makepkg, this file collides with previous versions and checksums fail.

mikezackles commented on 2021-06-03 16:19 (UTC)

@salif I added fontconfig and xorg-mkfontscale to makedepends. Does that fix things for you?

salif commented on 2021-06-03 15:04 (UTC)

I get an error:

rebuilding font cache... /tmp/alpm_2729y8/.INSTALL: line 4: mkfontscale: command not found
/tmp/alpm_2729y8/.INSTALL: line 5: mkfontdir: command not found

stylemistake commented on 2020-11-27 01:57 (UTC) (edited on 2020-11-27 02:00 (UTC) by stylemistake)

Hey, apparently it's necessary to clean build it every time: makepkg sees that Agave-Regular.ttf already exists in the cache and skips the download step. That's why md5sum was different for me every time! That also means I was using the old agave release all this time, because I replaced md5sum with SKIP. Smh.

Thanks for maintaining this package, I love this font!

mikezackles commented on 2019-06-05 16:29 (UTC)

Hmm that's odd. I just tried building with a fresh clone and also verified the checksum manually with no issue.

stylemistake commented on 2019-06-05 10:32 (UTC)

Checksums are still wrong. It seems as if the maintainer is silently swapping ttf files after the release.

mikezackles commented on 2019-05-30 15:22 (UTC)

Great!

TrevHolland commented on 2019-05-30 07:37 (UTC)

Perfect. Worked like a charm!

mikezackles commented on 2019-05-29 03:33 (UTC)

Oops! Should be updated now.

1 2 Next › Last »