Search Criteria
Package Details: ttf-amiri 1.001-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/ttf-amiri.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | ttf-amiri |
Description: | Amiri (أميري) is a body text Naskh typeface |
Upstream URL: | http://www.amirifont.org/ |
Licenses: | OFL-1.1 |
Submitter: | munzirtaha |
Maintainer: | munzirtaha |
Last Packager: | munzirtaha |
Votes: | 20 |
Popularity: | 0.001311 |
First Submitted: | 2013-01-26 23:51 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-19 16:08 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
munzirtaha commented on 2023-10-21 17:58 (UTC)
@zefr0x: Updated. Thanks!
zefr0x commented on 2023-10-20 11:14 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-20 11:17 (UTC) by zefr0x)
Please update the upstream url:
abdulhakeem commented on 2022-10-11 12:38 (UTC)
Please update
Also in the Description, "poineered" should be "pioneered"
munzirtaha commented on 2020-09-17 15:09 (UTC)
@caleb: Ok, fixed.
alerque commented on 2020-09-17 13:02 (UTC) (edited on 2020-09-17 13:03 (UTC) by alerque)
Don't go off of gentium-plus-font or any other single package as a guideline, the status of the OFL license changed a couple years ago but many packagers (including some [community] packages) haven't adjusted their practices yet. The wiki guidelines for Font packages is correct, as is the PKGBUILD section on licenses. The OFL is 'special' in the same sense that MIT is: they are considered standard licenses in that the package meta data does not have to call them
custom:
because they are used by multiple official packages, but you still have to include the license file because of the variance in copyright lines / reserved font name clauses at the top.In other words 'special' != 'custom'. MIT & OFL & a few others are 'special cases' where you have to also include the file, but for the sake of meta data normalization you do not have to mark them as "custom:".
munzirtaha commented on 2020-09-17 12:52 (UTC)
@caleb: This is a confusing bit because all or most of the packages are using custom:OFL. e.g.
gentium-plus-font
. man PKGBUILD statesIf the package provides a license not available in /usr/share/licenses/common, then you should include it in the package itself and set license=('custom') or license=('custom:LicenseName')
. The wiki considers OFL a special case.alerque commented on 2020-09-11 20:21 (UTC)
The license field should just be 'OFL', not 'custom:OFL'.