@mso I'm not sure what you are saying. The new checksum works for me (and looks like it does for you too?).
Search Criteria
Package Details: ttf-impallari-cantora 1.001-7
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/ttf-impallari-cantora.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | ttf-impallari-cantora |
| Description: | Cantora ('Singer' in Spanish) is a friendly semi-formal, semi-condensed, semi–sans-serif font, from Pablo Impallari |
| Upstream URL: | https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Cantora+One |
| Keywords: | font |
| Licenses: | OFL |
| Submitter: | chelqo |
| Maintainer: | Rhinoceros |
| Last Packager: | Rhinoceros |
| Votes: | 67 |
| Popularity: | 0.021022 |
| First Submitted: | 2012-08-01 03:10 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2022-11-13 23:34 (UTC) |
Rhinoceros commented on 2022-11-16 22:03 (UTC)
mso commented on 2022-11-16 12:33 (UTC)
I was unable to update this package (it reported and invalid sha256sum). It seems that the update did not force a new download of the file. I deleted the following folder: /var/tmp/pamac-build-marc/ttf-impallari-cantora
Then the updated worked as expected.
Rhinoceros commented on 2022-11-13 23:36 (UTC)
Upstream regularly changes the file without any documentation or notification. Please let me know in the comments if the checksum fails and I will update the PKGBUILD.
Rhinoceros commented on 2022-11-13 23:34 (UTC)
Thanks @kernelisstrong. Fixed!
kernelisstrong commented on 2022-11-13 10:21 (UTC)
Can you fix the validity check? The package does not seem to build anymore.
eggze commented on 2022-01-28 16:31 (UTC)
Installation is failing with: ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! -> error making: ttf-impallari-cantora
The new hash seems to be: 089057b197f7217ba017be6277cf645398333821ec10bdfe2e55650dd36ab635
Rhinoceros commented on 2020-08-16 10:45 (UTC)
Thanks @caleb. Done!
alerque commented on 2020-08-16 07:13 (UTC)
@Rhinocerous Please get rid of the fontconfig dependency as well, it does not belong here or on any font package that doesn't include and depend on custom fontconfig files. These fonts can be use directly on some systems even without fontconfig. See also the Wiki guidelines on font packaging to confirm this.
Rhinoceros commented on 2020-07-09 07:02 (UTC)
Hi, could you please update this package as per @nTia89's comments? Every other package in fonts-meta-extended-lt fixed this weeks ago.
nTia89 commented on 2020-06-29 21:03 (UTC)
Following upstream changes [1,2] we need to clean deps array.
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/todo/remove-unneeded-fontconfig-and-xorg-mkfontscale-dependencies-from-font-packages/ [2] https://www.archlinux.org/todo/removal-of-xorg-font-utils-transitional-package/
Pinned Comments
Rhinoceros commented on 2022-11-13 23:36 (UTC)
Upstream regularly changes the file without any documentation or notification. Please let me know in the comments if the checksum fails and I will update the PKGBUILD.