Can you fix the validity check? The package does not seem to build anymore.
Search Criteria
Package Details: ttf-impallari-cantora 1.002-2
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/ttf-impallari-cantora.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | ttf-impallari-cantora |
| Description: | Cantora ('Singer' in Spanish) is a friendly semi-formal, semi-condensed, semi-sans-serif font, from Pablo Impallari |
| Upstream URL: | https://fonts.google.com/specimen/Cantora+One |
| Keywords: | font |
| Licenses: | OFL |
| Groups: | impallari-fonts |
| Submitter: | chelqo |
| Maintainer: | koro666 |
| Last Packager: | koro666 |
| Votes: | 66 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2012-08-01 03:10 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-11-15 06:18 (UTC) |
kernelisstrong commented on 2022-11-13 10:21 (UTC)
eggze commented on 2022-01-28 16:31 (UTC)
Installation is failing with: ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! -> error making: ttf-impallari-cantora
The new hash seems to be: 089057b197f7217ba017be6277cf645398333821ec10bdfe2e55650dd36ab635
Rhinoceros commented on 2020-08-16 10:45 (UTC)
Thanks @caleb. Done!
alerque commented on 2020-08-16 07:13 (UTC)
@Rhinocerous Please get rid of the fontconfig dependency as well, it does not belong here or on any font package that doesn't include and depend on custom fontconfig files. These fonts can be use directly on some systems even without fontconfig. See also the Wiki guidelines on font packaging to confirm this.
Rhinoceros commented on 2020-07-09 07:02 (UTC)
Hi, could you please update this package as per @nTia89's comments? Every other package in fonts-meta-extended-lt fixed this weeks ago.
nTia89 commented on 2020-06-29 21:03 (UTC)
Following upstream changes [1,2] we need to clean deps array.
[1] https://www.archlinux.org/todo/remove-unneeded-fontconfig-and-xorg-mkfontscale-dependencies-from-font-packages/ [2] https://www.archlinux.org/todo/removal-of-xorg-font-utils-transitional-package/
zman0900 commented on 2020-05-26 15:11 (UTC)
@chelqo: sorry about that. Checksum was failing on download, but it seems this was a false error caused by pacaur. I think since there is no version number in the downloaded file name, it doesn't try to download the file again which obviously won't work.
Sounds like the same "problem" that was fixed for this other font by adding a version to the file name: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=font-symbola&id=da8829ec76c216c097b88c46e55ff198939fb3c3
chelqo commented on 2019-12-02 15:17 (UTC)
@zman0900: What is the reason why you mark the package as outdated? PKGBUILD works perfectly, the author has not released new updates and the file that is downloaded from fonts.google.com contains the latest version.
Rhinoceros commented on 2019-08-22 01:35 (UTC)
@chelqo Yes it seems very strange. I have no idea why it would be changing on the Google server, which is why I was suggesting using the Wayback Machine instead, which should be more stable.
chelqo commented on 2019-08-21 23:53 (UTC)
PKGBUILD updated. Thanks @xythrez for the data!
@Rhinoceros, this has already happened to us with the previous update, I don't know why the file is changed on the Google server, when the author has not released a new version, and the updated ttf retains the same version number as the previous one.
Pinned Comments
Rhinoceros commented on 2024-04-02 00:51 (UTC)
The official Google source now obfuscates the download link, which changes on each download. This package now downloads from a third-party site. Please let me know if there are any issues.