Package Details: ttf-iosevka 2.1.0-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: ttf-iosevka
Description: A slender monospace typeface. Shape: default
Upstream URL:
Licenses: custom:OFL
Conflicts: ttf-iosevka-pack
Submitter: Markus00000
Maintainer: Markus00000
Last Packager: Markus00000
Votes: 83
Popularity: 3.987358
First Submitted: 2015-07-27 06:43
Last Updated: 2019-02-01 08:34

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

Markus00000 commented on 2017-11-04 17:37

@Ataraxy It’s a soft limit that is regularly ignored. “Also try to keep the descriptions to ~80 characters or less.” (

Not sure whether the PKGBUILD is a good place. Normally one would see it only after deciding to install a package. I’ve thought about adding a sticky comment to each AUR page, but finding the info there isn’t straightforward either.

Ataraxy commented on 2017-11-04 15:04

@Markus00000 Thanks for explaining the character limit.

Would you consider putting that link in a comment in the PKGBUILD?

Markus00000 commented on 2017-11-04 07:45

@Ataraxy The differences are explained on the releases page under “Download Options”:

Package descriptions should be no longer than 80 characters. I haven’t found a way to put all the differences and a description of Iosevka into 80 characters.

Does that help you?

Ataraxy commented on 2017-11-04 05:01

What is the difference between this and the -pack and -term variants?

Could the descriptions of each be updated to differentiate them?

nesv commented on 2017-07-24 14:06

@Markus00000 That was it! Thank you.

Markus00000 commented on 2017-06-29 17:58

@nesv The problem is an old copy of in your cache. The checksum is correct.

nesv commented on 2017-06-29 17:51

@Markus00000 I'm still getting a checksum error for the license:

==> Validating source files with sha256sums... ... Passed ... FAILED

Markus00000 commented on 2017-06-05 08:31

@ljxfstorm Thanks, it was updated after the release. Fixed it.

ljxfstorm commented on 2017-06-05 03:02

LICENSE was updated to 2017, the checksum needs to be changed.

Markus00000 commented on 2017-01-20 13:26

@SanderMaijers The checksums are correct. I assume your cache contains an old Delete it and try again.

See my previous comments for more details.