AUR (en) - ttf-ms-fonts

Search Criteria

Package Details: ttf-ms-fonts 2.0-10

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/ttf-ms-fonts.git (read-only)
Package Base:	ttf-ms-fonts
Description:	Core TTF Fonts from Microsoft
Upstream URL:	http://corefonts.sourceforge.net/
Keywords:	corefonts
Licenses:	custom:microsoft
Provides:	ttf-font
Submitter:	None
Maintainer:	birdflesh
Last Packager:	birdflesh
Votes:	1859
Popularity:	11.729751
First Submitted:	2010-12-01 11:17
Last Updated:	2017-05-10 20:28

Git Clone URL:

https://aur.archlinux.org/ttf-ms-fonts.git (read-only)

Package Base:

ttf-ms-fonts

Description:

Core TTF Fonts from Microsoft

Upstream URL:

http://corefonts.sourceforge.net/

Keywords:

corefonts

Licenses:

Provides:

Submitter:

None

Maintainer:

birdflesh

Last Packager:

birdflesh

Votes:

1859

Popularity:

11.729751

First Submitted:

2010-12-01 11:17

Last Updated:

2017-05-10 20:28

Latest Comments

Win8Error commented on 2018-02-25 18:30

Build failed:

install: der Aufruf von stat für '*.ttf' ist nicht möglich: Datei oder Verzeichnis nicht gefunden ==> FEHLER: Ein Fehler geschah in package(). Breche ab...

Jristz commented on 2017-09-26 21:30

What about using the original web page as upstream webpage on the pkgbuild?
https://web.archive.org/web/20020124085641/http://www.microsoft.com/typography/fontpack/default.htm

Also Im having problems downloading from sourceforge, is possible list either in a comment on the pkgbuild another source?

Edit: I think this is why I have problems also in other networks, at this point better add a non-sourceforge mirror just in case
https://www.theregister.co.uk/2017/09/27/faulty_data_center_takes_out_sourceforge/

birdflesh commented on 2017-05-10 20:06

@srand thanks for the suggestion. Install file was removed with no version bump.

srand commented on 2017-05-10 19:39

No need for the .install file anymore, everything font-related that's done in there is handled by pacman hooks now.

beroal commented on 2016-11-30 19:34

@mgd: I can give a summary. One party in the discussion says that SHA256 is no better than MD5 because here a hash is used for error checking, not for security. So SHA256 is no better than any CRC.

mgd commented on 2016-11-30 18:05

Care to give a summary?
I can't read that bbs w/o registering beforehand (which I won't do for the sole purpose to read your link).

birdflesh commented on 2016-11-30 14:07

Respectfully, I won't be switching to SHA256.
Reasoning behind this decision can be found here:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=217588

procrastinator commented on 2016-11-29 20:51

Second what the previous commenter said. Please switch to sha256sums.

GI_Jack commented on 2016-11-23 21:54

MD5sums are sooo 1996.

SHA256 plz

hawaka commented on 2016-08-01 16:21

The md5 errors did occur for me too. They seem to only happen when I don't have mhash installd.
Maybe mhash should be added as a dependency for yaourt.

Arch Linux User Repository