Search Criteria
Package Details: ttf-recursive 1.085-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/ttf-recursive.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | ttf-recursive |
Description: | A variable type family built for better code & UI |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/arrowtype/recursive |
Licenses: | OFL |
Submitter: | mrxx |
Maintainer: | mrxx |
Last Packager: | mrxx |
Votes: | 14 |
Popularity: | 0.000071 |
First Submitted: | 2019-11-06 11:52 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-07-07 23:57 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
mrxx commented on 2021-08-30 19:15 (UTC)
Thanks, fixed. Upstream wrote: "This release originally contained version 1.078 fonts in the Recursive_Code folder. They are now the correct version 1.079 fonts."
codl commented on 2021-08-30 10:55 (UTC)
sha256 sum doesn't seem to match
mrxx commented on 2021-08-11 15:36 (UTC)
Thank you, alerque. Done for both ttf-recursive and otf-recursive.
alerque commented on 2021-08-11 13:07 (UTC)
Please drop the fontconfig dependency, see the Wiki font package guideline page for why. It is obsolete.
Also the license should be listed as just
license=(OFL)
, the Wiki also mentions this in the licensing section.mrxx commented on 2021-03-31 22:32 (UTC)
Right, Toadtoad. Fixed, thank you.
Toadtoad commented on 2021-03-31 17:27 (UTC)
It appears there's been another change, making the checksum incorrect. Correct sha256 sum is fe66201fe9d50c39123989779709cfb8870085cb7736a83888075cf0cbd01757
mrxx commented on 2020-08-06 21:13 (UTC)
Fixed. Upstream had "updated the release to fix version numbers in filenames".
mehalter commented on 2020-08-06 17:52 (UTC)
I believe the sha256sum is incorrect, I am getting a sum mismatch and I downloaded straight from GitHub and checked and I believe it is incorrect.