Package Details: unrpyc 2:2.0.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/unrpyc.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: unrpyc
Description: A ren'py script decompiler
Upstream URL: https://github.com/CensoredUsername/unrpyc
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: Stary2001
Maintainer: dcelasun
Last Packager: dcelasun
Votes: 7
Popularity: 0.041978
First Submitted: 2015-08-12 14:31 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-02 08:16 (UTC)

Dependencies (2)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

fenuks commented on 2024-09-06 07:39 (UTC)

I don't say it's an issue, but arguably it complicates/uglifies the version number. Personally, I would remove when a new major version of python is about to be released, but that's my opinion. Yes, it would show as a downgrade, but just once, when you are forced to rebuild manually to get package working.

dcelasun commented on 2024-09-06 07:31 (UTC) (edited on 2024-09-06 07:47 (UTC) by dcelasun)

That's not the problem. If I remove it, everyone who currently has it installed with epoch=2 will see it as a downgrade when they try to install a new version. Anyway, it's not an issue.

fenuks commented on 2024-09-06 07:19 (UTC)

I got it build without it, so I had to rebuild. I think you could remove it just before Arch packages new major version of python, since package will have to be rebuilt to make it work again.

dcelasun commented on 2024-09-06 05:00 (UTC)

You can't remove epoch once added, because it would register as a downgrade. Why do you care?

fenuks commented on 2024-09-05 21:21 (UTC)

Is there a good reason to keep using epoch in PKGBUILD?

dcelasun commented on 2024-09-02 07:57 (UTC)

@fenuks because the tagged versions were broken with latest renpy for a long, long time. I'll update soon.

fenuks commented on 2024-09-02 07:36 (UTC)

@dcelasun Why do you use git to build non-git package, when it is possible to build it from source archive?

diff --git i/PKGBUILD w/PKGBUILD
index fb837af..6e3c7cb 100644
--- i/PKGBUILD
+++ w/PKGBUILD
@@ -2,22 +2,17 @@
 # Contributor: Ezekiel Bethel <mctinfoilball@gmail.com>

 pkgname=unrpyc
-pkgver=2.0.1.r11.g1eae493
+pkgver=2.0.2
 pkgrel=1
-epoch=2
 pkgdesc="A ren'py script decompiler"
 arch=("any")
 url="https://github.com/CensoredUsername/unrpyc"
 license=('MIT')
 depends=("python")
 makedepends=("python-setuptools")
-source=("git+https://github.com/CensoredUsername/unrpyc.git#branch=dev")
-sha256sums=('SKIP')
+source=("${pkgname}-${pkgver}::${url}/archive/refs/tags/v${pkgver}.tar.gz")
+sha256sums=('0e5f29fd63965606ab83a5f9b3bdee53232f4614251132bfc4bf999f05cb7f37')

-pkgver() {
-  cd "${srcdir}/unrpyc"
-  git describe --long --tags | sed 's/^v//;s/\([^-]*-g\)/r\1/;s/-/./g'
-}

 prepare () {
     cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname}"
@@ -26,9 +21,9 @@ prepare () {

 package() {
   install -d "${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/${pkgname}"
-  
+
   install -m644 "${srcdir}/${pkgname}/LICENSE" "${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/${pkgname}/LICENSE"
-  
+
   cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname}"
   python setup.py install --root="${pkgdir}"
   mv "${pkgdir}/usr/bin/unrpyc.py" "${pkgdir}/usr/bin/unrpyc"

mirh commented on 2024-02-25 12:24 (UTC)

Well, du-uh... After years of nothingness, they decided to update the main repo just now (and the other dev branches were deleted).

dcelasun commented on 2024-01-18 12:06 (UTC)

OK, switched to that fork.

mirh commented on 2024-01-17 23:57 (UTC)

Well, the python 2 branches shouldn't even be considered in this day and age. On top of that, after some cursory comparison of the patchsets, py3_v1.2.0_dev is undoubtedly the most modern and comprehensive.

1 2 Next › Last »