Search Criteria
Package Details: upd72020x-fw 1:1.0.0-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/upd72020x-fw.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | upd72020x-fw |
Description: | Renesas uPD720201 / uPD720202 USB 3.0 chipsets firmware |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/denisandroid/uPD72020x-Firmware |
Keywords: | firmware uPD720200 uPD720201 uPD720202 xhci_pci |
Licenses: | custom |
Submitter: | redchenjs |
Maintainer: | ZombieJesus9k |
Last Packager: | redchenjs |
Votes: | 150 |
Popularity: | 4.00 |
First Submitted: | 2020-08-21 15:45 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-09-04 15:12 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »
mark commented on 2025-05-16 06:12 (UTC)
Any advice on what to do if my USB ports still don't work (at all, no juice coming from them) on my T14s Gen1 even after installing the firmware to the latest version (2.0.2.6)?
HighValueWarrior commented on 2025-05-11 14:13 (UTC)
What is happening with this package ?
RAMChYLD commented on 2025-04-29 13:58 (UTC)
Freshly reinstalled a PC. Can confirm that the version from archive.org checks out with the sha512 and built properly.
Zentino commented on 2025-04-27 14:51 (UTC)
@ZombieJesus9k the file integrity is ensured by hash. The pressing issue is the upstream went out and the package is unable to be built isn't it?
broller commented on 2025-04-08 16:53 (UTC)
@birbkeks attempted it on a burner computer and the sha512 hashes pass and install correctly.
birbkeks commented on 2025-04-06 20:03 (UTC)
original github page (https://github.com/denisandroid/uPD72020x-Firmware) is removed so aur package gives 404 error, i found this backup github page for it, i dont know if its safe or not.
https://github.com/mahatmus-tech/uPD72020x-Firmware
gothicVI commented on 2025-04-06 09:13 (UTC)
aic94xx-firmware recently switched to archive.org: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=aic94xx-firmware&id=e5895cd76575e3764520e1dd961afdec7e1976c3 I'm still not convinced this couldn't be a solution for the time being.
abouvier commented on 2025-04-04 19:43 (UTC) (edited on 2025-04-04 19:43 (UTC) by abouvier)
The real source should be the official Windows installer for the driver that contains this firmware. And it should be extracted in the
prepare
function.gothicVI commented on 2025-04-04 19:10 (UTC)
@ZombieJesus9k a valid concern. However, my claim is that there's no need for a different hash for the same file. Independent of where it's hosted.
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »