Search Criteria
Package Details: upd72020x-fw 1:1.0.0-3
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/upd72020x-fw.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | upd72020x-fw |
| Description: | Renesas uPD720201 / uPD720202 USB 3.0 chipsets firmware |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/denisandroid/uPD72020x-Firmware |
| Keywords: | firmware uPD720200 uPD720201 uPD720202 xhci_pci |
| Licenses: | custom |
| Submitter: | redchenjs |
| Maintainer: | AurelienDuval6 |
| Last Packager: | AurelienDuval6 |
| Votes: | 159 |
| Popularity: | 2.46 |
| First Submitted: | 2020-08-21 15:45 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-05-25 09:21 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »
glek commented on 2025-11-13 22:44 (UTC)
I can also verify (as I mentioned earlier) that the
UPDATE.memfrom Renesas themselves has an identical checksum to theK2026090.memfile in the web archive. So that all checks out.nursoda commented on 2025-11-13 22:14 (UTC)
This PKGBUILD should NOT be flagged out-of-date since only the anyway-3rd-party location changed. @AurelienDuval6 are you able to remove that flag? And probably pin a post explaining the state of this AUR package?
According to PKGBUILD, when installed, UPDATE.mem is extracted from https://web.archive.org/web/20240316231746if_/https://codeload.github.com/denisandroid/uPD72020x-Firmware/tar.gz/refs/tags/1.0.0. To make sure this file is safe, I registered with renesas.com and downloaded the driver from https://www.renesas.com/en/products/upd720202?tab=software-tools . Renesas does not provide checksums, so no way to verify that download. But "K2026090.mem" from the manufacturer's zip is IDENTICAL to "UPDATE.mem" from archive.org. So it's OK to use the archive.org source. Considering the license note I had to acknowledge when downloading, this might be better than if the maintainer would store it here or in some public GIT repo.
And, yes, that file dates back to 2013-11-12. That does not mean that it is faulty. Searching for it revealed no indicators for bugs or even security vulnerabilities in that firmware. That does not mean it's secure either. But it's as secure as it ever was.
gentux commented on 2025-10-30 17:06 (UTC)
I just configured my Xerox WorkCentre 3045 via foo2hbpl2 https://openprinting.org/printer/Xerox/Xerox-WorkCentre_3045 cups http://localhost:631 Network Printer → AppSocket/HP JetDirec socket://192.168.2.1:9100 Xerox Phaser 3040 / WorkCentre 3045 (foo2xqx)
LuxFerre commented on 2025-10-27 16:40 (UTC)
I didn't really notice a need for this. Apart from the missing firmware warning nothing seems to change?
gentux commented on 2025-10-27 14:39 (UTC)
Connect the chaotic-aur repo; it contains upd72020x-fw 1:1.0.0-3
erickwill commented on 2025-10-27 14:17 (UTC)
Any update on this warnings? Any trick or workaround to update to the last one?
JohnDoe79 commented on 2025-10-22 19:14 (UTC)
I removed this firmware packaged and replaced it with a dummy as I was only having it installed to get rid of those pesky warnings.
glek commented on 2025-10-22 17:34 (UTC)
Also, it appears this package has been using the outdated/oldest version of the firmware from the original package for basically... Ever? That's probably incorrect as the
tar.gzcontains multiple.memfiles for newer firmware versions withUPDATE.membeing the oldest of them based on my understanding. The firmware I have corresponds to theUPDATE.mem 2.0.2.6firmware memory file with SHA-512 hash1ea117f9a1a772013fb7509c76d731865e6c05ae3c55a304ff42b31ec8a474e9bf16dd1b05b2e5b666ec5fd301aefed54bfeb6bfd7c3f23dc23faf082cf2a9f7, same as in the original file.glek commented on 2025-10-22 17:20 (UTC)
I'm not sure when the firmware that was being supplied from the GitHub URL was last retrieved from Renesas but I have a copy of the latest firmware on hand from their official website. There's no cost to acquire this firmware file but you do need to sign up for an account and provide a bunch of personal information to create said account which is... Not great. I can host it but I'm not sure I can put it on GitHub because I'm 90% certain the reason it got taken down before was due to legal claims by Renesas themselves. If I had to speculate.
JohnDoe79 commented on 2025-10-09 12:17 (UTC)
Any news on an updates for this package?
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »