Search Criteria
Package Details: urw-classico 20250803-3
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/urw-classico.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | urw-classico |
| Description: | URW Classico font from CTAN (for texlive) |
| Upstream URL: | https://www.ctan.org/tex-archive/fonts/urw/classico |
| Keywords: | font latex texlive zapf |
| Licenses: | AGPL-3.0-only |
| Submitter: | rkubosz |
| Maintainer: | rkubosz (vale) |
| Last Packager: | rkubosz |
| Votes: | 2 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2017-01-05 18:08 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-08-09 11:08 (UTC) |
Dependencies (1)
- texlive-core (texlive-installerAUR, texlive-fullAUR, texlive-basic)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
Dornhoeschen commented on 2025-08-11 00:27 (UTC)
forcing a rebuild with yay solved the problem on my end:
rkubosz commented on 2025-08-10 13:34 (UTC) (edited on 2025-08-10 13:36 (UTC) by rkubosz)
Thanks. The most likely explanation for the authentication failures you encounter during package build is that the link https://mirrors.ctan.org/install/fonts/urw/classico.tds.zip gets redirected to an out-of-sync mirror of CTAN.
You can check the status of every ctan mirror here https://ctan.org/mirrors/mirmon.
As I checked the
classico.tds.zipfile from the ebinger.cc mirror -- it has a matching sha256 checksum with the one in PKGBUILD. But when I checked the file downloaded from https://mirror.bjtu.edu.cn/CTAN/install/fonts/urw/classico.tds.zip (right now the mirror is 9 days old) -- the checksum does not match the latest release of the classico package.Right now there are something like 5 mirrors with an age more than 1 day.
Dornhoeschen commented on 2025-08-10 11:37 (UTC) (edited on 2025-08-10 11:37 (UTC) by Dornhoeschen)
Assuming the warning appears due to a binary file being resolved.
See: https://www.warp.dev/terminus/curl-follow-redirect
rkubosz commented on 2025-08-09 11:08 (UTC)
Hi dornhoeschen,
could you send me the output of
curl https://mirrors.ctan.org/install/fonts/urw/classico.tds.zip? This link is only a redirection to a mirror, probably the closest one for user. I would like to reproduce circumstances in which this error occurs. Oddly, on my machine the package builds.Dornhoeschen commented on 2025-08-09 10:41 (UTC)
Still the same problem on my end
rkubosz commented on 2025-08-06 19:50 (UTC) (edited on 2025-08-06 19:52 (UTC) by rkubosz)
Hi @dreieck
there's some sketchy thing with this sha256sum of the classico.tds.zip file. The previous release made by vale gave me the same error like you experience now. Found out that the previous link was only a redirection. I put now a direct link to tds archive, so now I hope that the pkgbuild will work on every machine.
Please let me now if it builds now.
dreieck commented on 2025-08-06 10:56 (UTC)
Source file checksum verification fails since last update:
Regards!
vale commented on 2025-07-11 17:27 (UTC)
No worries! We currently only install the latex part. I know less about packaging fonts, but if that's all we'd need to do to bring in the opentype fonts, that could be done.
Dornhoeschen commented on 2025-07-11 16:19 (UTC) (edited on 2025-07-11 17:10 (UTC) by Dornhoeschen)
@vale I am sorry to bother again - I ended up installing the font manually as the otf files were not installed. Do you install the latex part only? After I copied the oft files to
/usr/share/fonts/urw-classicomy system detected the new font and I could use it in any program.Is this intended? Would you mind to include the otf part or is there an alternative?
Dornhoeschen commented on 2025-07-11 15:15 (UTC) (edited on 2025-07-11 15:15 (UTC) by Dornhoeschen)
@vale WoW - that was quick - thanks - works as expected!
1 2 3 Next › Last »