Package Details: ventoy-bin 1.0.99-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/ventoy-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ventoy-bin
Description: A new bootable USB solution
Upstream URL: http://www.ventoy.net
Keywords: boot image iso multiboot usb
Licenses: GPL-3.0-or-later
Conflicts: ventoy
Provides: ventoy
Submitter: DuckSoft
Maintainer: DuckSoft (KokaKiwi, yochananmarqos, Kr1ss)
Last Packager: yochananmarqos
Votes: 360
Popularity: 8.01
First Submitted: 2020-05-19 06:14 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-13 03:01 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .. 16 Next › Last »

yochananmarqos commented on 2021-12-02 18:17 (UTC)

@NGr: Sheesh, apparently I need more coffee.

@Kr1ss: Thanks. You missed plugson.tar.xz, though.

Kr1ss commented on 2021-12-02 17:36 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-02 17:39 (UTC) by Kr1ss)

Adapted the patch file and fixed the typo. Should be okay now (hope I haven't overlooked anything). ( Thx all @yochananmarqos @crondrift @7thson @NGr !

NGr commented on 2021-12-02 16:58 (UTC)

There is a } missing at the end of line 75 of the PKGBUILD

crondrift commented on 2021-12-02 16:48 (UTC)

install: cannot stat 'tool/*.{cer,glade,json,sh,xz': No such file or directory ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package(). Aborting... error: failed to build 'ventoy-bin-1.0.62-2': error: packages failed to build: ventoy-bin-1.0.62-2

yochananmarqos commented on 2021-12-02 16:36 (UTC)

@7thSon: Fixed.

7thSon commented on 2021-12-02 16:34 (UTC)

The latest update is prompting the user for input when preparing the package, with the the message File to patch:.

ron2138 commented on 2021-11-19 16:42 (UTC)

ventoy has an archwiki article. It could be you have some comments; or want to extend it; or something else.

aminvakil commented on 2021-09-22 09:08 (UTC)

@amish Right, so you just mean it looks different. I thought it has some meaningful difference ;)

amish commented on 2021-09-22 09:03 (UTC) (edited on 2021-09-22 09:03 (UTC) by amish)

@aminvakil You rm something with rm .xz why would you do rm ./.xz?

And even though it is not scary, but ./.xz actually looks like /.xz as if you are deleting from root (/) directory.

aminvakil commented on 2021-09-22 07:12 (UTC)

@amish What's the difference?