Search Criteria
Package Details: vim-gitgutter-git 409.gdcac1f7-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/vim-gitgutter-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | vim-gitgutter-git |
Description: | A Vim plugin which shows a git diff in the 'gutter' |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/airblade/vim-gitgutter |
Licenses: | MIT |
Groups: | vim-plugins |
Conflicts: | vim-gitgutter |
Provides: | vim-gitgutter |
Submitter: | jsst |
Maintainer: | eschwartz |
Last Packager: | eschwartz |
Votes: | 6 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2013-04-17 18:40 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2017-07-20 16:26 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR)
- vim (neovim-drop-inAUR, neovim-symlinksAUR, vim-cli-gitAUR, gvim-wayland-lilydjwg-gitAUR, vim-gitAUR, gvim-gtk2AUR, gvim)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
Rhinoceros commented on 2020-06-25 13:41 (UTC)
Personally, yes! I agree with you, and also very much dislike epochs. However, I was more perturbed by the slightly-hard-to-read versioning. But up to you of course!
eschwartz commented on 2020-06-25 12:15 (UTC)
Regrettably, it was like this when I adopted it.
I could add the "r", but it would require adding an epoch as well. That is what held me back, 5 years ago. I figured it wasn't a high priority since I doubt this upstream will ever do tags.
Considering it would add an epoch and become "1:r409.gdcac1f7-1", are you sure you still want it?
Rhinoceros commented on 2020-06-25 10:07 (UTC)
Could you please change the pkgver format to be consistent with the advice in the wiki? i.e.
printf "r%s.%s" "$(git rev-list --count HEAD)" "$(git rev-parse --short HEAD)"
Thanks in advance!petronny commented on 2019-01-10 07:37 (UTC)
Hi, could you removed
groups=(vim-plugins)
from the PKGBUILD? It's not It's not necessary for AUR. And if a third-party repository provides the binary version of this package, it will alter the behavior of installing the official group which may causes somethings, such as tutorials for beginners, fail.jsst commented on 2014-07-22 21:00 (UTC)
svenstaro commented on 2014-07-22 19:02 (UTC)
jsst commented on 2014-07-22 18:12 (UTC)
svenstaro commented on 2014-07-22 02:43 (UTC)
svenstaro commented on 2014-07-11 15:39 (UTC)
1 2 Next › Last »