Package Details: visual-studio-code 1.12.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/visual-studio-code.git (read-only)
Package Base: visual-studio-code
Description: Visual Studio Code: Editor for building and debugging modern web and cloud applications (official binary version)
Upstream URL: https://code.visualstudio.com/
Keywords: code studio visual visual-studio-code vscode
Licenses: custom: commercial
Provides: vscode,visualstudiocode
Submitter: dcelasun
Maintainer: dcelasun
Last Packager: dcelasun
Votes: 375
Popularity: 34.258871
First Submitted: 2015-04-29 17:53
Last Updated: 2017-05-16 05:27

Latest Comments

dcelasun commented on 2017-05-19 20:47

@NicoHood: Please read what I wrote, a few comments down from yours. Basically, you are looking for this [0].

[0] https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/visual-studio-code-oss

NicoHood commented on 2017-05-19 20:43

I might be wrong, but isnt this package open source as MIT license?
https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode

Why dont you build from source instead?

bam365 commented on 2017-05-16 01:43

This will change again before very long, but as of 2017-05-15 the current version is 1.12.2. This won't build unless in PKGBUILD you change md5sums_x86_64 to:

md5sums_x86_64=('aca84ee07b151ef4731d1516368f268a'
'b5d0d40f5f22b4efb0b3d05c287f8704')

I would think a better solution though would be to download a specific version of VS Code as opposed to the latest. That way the PKGBUILD will at least work instead of giving an MD5 error, although it will build an out-of-date version. To do that, change source_x86_64 to:

source_x86_64=(code_x64_${pkgver}.tar.gz::https://vscode-update.azurewebsites.net/${pkgver}/linux-x64/stable
${pkgname}.desktop
)



vith commented on 2017-05-15 22:51

Shouldn't this package have a -bin suffix then?

https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Nonfree_applications_package_guidelines#Package_naming

dcelasun commented on 2017-05-05 18:56

As mentioned in the package description, this is the official binary compiled and distributed by upstream. The main difference is the extension manager: This package supports the extension gallery [0], the oss version doesn't (by default). See the note in the PKGBUILD [1] for details.

[0] https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/editor/extension-gallery
[1] https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=visual-studio-code-oss#n4

hutliver commented on 2017-05-05 18:46

Hello, what's the difference between this package and 'visual-studio-code-oss'? I thought vscode was open source by default..

darky974 commented on 2017-05-05 01:28

for the newest version

pkgver=1.12.1

md5sums_x86_64=('11d387b2c27e530e36f65f41d20eef86'
'b5d0d40f5f22b4efb0b3d05c287f8704')

kelvinosse commented on 2017-05-04 21:47

Getting the next error :(
==> Validating source_x86_64 files with md5sums...
code_x64_1.11.tar.gz ... FAILED
visual-studio-code.desktop ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build visual-studio-code.

Why?

Fafa123 commented on 2017-04-20 18:38

Be aware that VSCode seems to ignore telemetry settings.
The extension gallery is the telemtry source for official releases (hence it being stripped out in a true OSS version). Also Microsoft plugins aswell seem to ignore the telemetry setting.

dcelasun commented on 2017-04-18 16:17

I've added some keywords. The description was changed because some AUR helpers apparently have trouble without it (see a few comments below yours).

In any case, it's a cosmetic change so it will have to wait till the next release at least.

All comments