Package Details: vuurmuur 0.7-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/vuurmuur.git (read-only)
Package Base: vuurmuur
Description: powerful front-end for iptables aimed at system-administrators who need a decent firewall, but dont have netfilter specific knowledge
Upstream URL: http://www.vuurmuur.org
Licenses: GPL
Conflicts: vuurmuur-devel
Submitter: None
Maintainer: dracorp
Last Packager: dracorp
Votes: 23
Popularity: 0.070771
First Submitted: 2008-01-12 10:43
Last Updated: 2015-11-16 20:20

Dependencies (6)

Required by (0)

Sources (5)

Latest Comments

dracorp commented on 2014-09-16 12:59

@dopm: added but this file is created during configuration.

dracorp commented on 2014-09-16 12:59

@dopm: added but this file is created during configuration.

hav3lock commented on 2014-09-16 01:08

@dracorp, could you share the contents of your textdir.conf? Vanilla installation doesn't seem to include one.

dracorp commented on 2012-10-22 15:47

Downgraded to 0.7. If anyone wants version 0.8beta4: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=63839

dracorp commented on 2012-10-20 19:12

Maybe created vuurmuur package and vuurmuur-beta?

Anonymous comment on 2012-10-20 08:25

Tested on linux-ck-3.6.1 with ipv6.disable=1 and systemd. Removed ip_queue from modules.conf but still fails probably because of failing to do ipv6 in vuurmuur-0.8
Also according to the vuurmuur website NAT does not work yet. suggest regression to version 0.7 ?

dracorp commented on 2012-10-10 10:17

Tested on linux-3.5.4-1 and systemd. Removed ip_queue from modules.conf.

dracorp commented on 2012-04-16 12:56

Then disown.

valr commented on 2012-04-09 10:55

On my side I can't even boot 3.3.1-1 : kernel panic.
Anyway I'm not using vuurmuur anymore (I switched to husk). Someone interested to maintain the package ?

Tarqi commented on 2012-04-09 01:07

So, conntrack is broken again :( Specifiying '-t' will help to startup vuurmuur, but the connection page can not be used, because /proc/net/ip_conntrack is missing (kernel 3.3.1-1-ARCH).

Tarqi commented on 2012-04-09 00:31

So, conntrack is broken again :( Specifiying '-t' will help to startup vuurmuur, but the connection page can not be used. Any ideas?

Tarqi commented on 2012-04-08 18:56

If you have problems getting vuurmuur started when updated to kernel 3.3, edit your /etc/rc.d/vuurmuur, find the line "/usr/bin/vuurmuur -l" and change it to "/usr/bin/vuurmuur -l -t". To bad that there are no fixes for this 3 year old version :(

Tarqi commented on 2011-03-29 18:48

I noticed, it works again. However, the "Accounting" detail in the connection page is still lost. Btw, what has been patched? The upstream kernel? Could not find more information on this...

valr commented on 2011-03-28 09:50

For info: patch for the conntrack problem is included in 2.6.37-5
This patch solves the problem of the 'Connection' Page in vurrmuur_conf.

Tarqi commented on 2011-02-11 21:30

@dobedo: i see, thanks. ok, time to wait now... thx again.

valr commented on 2011-02-10 08:10

@Tarqi: check this https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=890385#p890385

Tarqi commented on 2011-02-09 15:02

Yes, same here. Digging around doesn't help. So what? Filing a bug in the Arch Repo? Or the Kernel Hackers?

valr commented on 2011-02-08 21:32

mmmh, indeed it seems that there is a problem. this is what I can find after looking at the vuurmuur code: file /proc/net/ip_conntrack is read but...

[root@laptop ~]$ cat /proc/net/ip_conntrack
cat: /proc/net/ip_conntrack: No space left on device

Tarqi commented on 2011-02-07 00:38

I recently did an update to kernel 2.6.37 and iproute2. I am not shure if this is the reason, but now the "Connection" Page in vurrmuur_conf is not working anymore. It got some problems before (the "Account" detail got lost), but now it is quite unusable. Very sad, because i really like it (however, i never got the connection tracking successfully to work, nor any multicast... and the manual could be more detailed). I tried to contact the developers by irc without success. Instead of posting a bug report (which i did once for MPD, it just "got lost"...), i thought i let you know from the problems here.

Tarqi commented on 2011-02-07 00:37

I recently did an update to kernel 2.6.37 and . I am not shure if this is the reason, but now the "Connection" Page in vurrmuur_conf is not working anymore. It got some problems before (the "Account" detail got lost), but now it is quite unusable. Very sad, because i really like it (however, i never got the connection tracking successfully to work, nor any multicast... and the manual could be more detailed). I tried to contact the developers by irc without success. Instead of posting a bug report (which i did once for MPD, it just "got lost"...), i thought i let you know from the problems here.

Anonymous comment on 2010-10-08 14:32

@dobedo: Got it! Was looking at the wrong script. Was able to solve it after that. Thx!

valr commented on 2010-10-08 07:09

@brunopereira81: You shouldn't run the vuurmuur-initd.sh script. It's the script provided by vuurmuur for install without package manager, IIRC.
After having installed the package from the AUR, you have to configure the firewall using vuurmuur_conf. To start/stop/restart the daemon, there is the script /etc/rc.d/rc.vuurmuur

Anonymous comment on 2010-10-07 21:02

I am having problems starting up vuurmuur in Arch, I am not sure but I think I did all that I was supose to do but still the dam daemon doesn't start up.

I have installed vuurmuur from the AUR and added vuurmuur and iptables as daemons in rc.conf as instructed, I am having fault status at boot cause of it but they don't show up in /var/log/everything.log or dmesg (how can one easylly see the boot log for faults?)

Running vuurmuur_conf I can solve all the faults except for the daemons.

Running vuurmuur-initd.sh start I get:

[root@archbox scripts]# sh ./vuurmuur-initd.sh start
Starting firewall: Vuurmuur:
Loading modules: ip_tables iptable_filter iptable_mangle iptable_nat ip_conntrack ipt_state ip_conntrack_ftp ip_nat_ftp ip_queue
Loading Vuurmuur: FAILED.
Loading Vuurmuur_log: FAILED.
Starting firewall: Vuurmuur: done

vuurmuur_conf still says that the daemons are down.

Any ideas / help ?

valr commented on 2010-04-05 18:44

Changelog 0.7-7:
- fix build problems reported by sirocco.

...at 0.7-10, I pay a drink!

valr commented on 2010-04-05 18:43

Fix build problems reported by sirocco.

sirocco commented on 2010-04-05 11:01

OK, makepkg run without errors.
http://aur.pastebin.com/5taE8zrj

I will try to install vuurmuur 0.7 later on this week.

valr commented on 2010-04-05 08:21

Hmm, same commands are generated on my system and on yours, grrr
Can you try by replacing the PKGBUILD in 0.7-6 with this one: http://aur.pastebin.com/rFF1K8kj

sirocco commented on 2010-04-05 04:26

Another error
http://aur.pastebin.com/L7E6VziM

valr commented on 2010-04-04 08:58

@sirocco, can you please try this version and let me know if it's ok now ?
Thanks

valr commented on 2010-04-04 08:58

Changelog 0.7-6:
- fix for rpath problem reported by sirocco (thanks).
- modules to be loaded by rc script are moved into /etc/vuurmuur/modules.conf
- iptrafvol added as optional dependency.
- at install, the default firewall configuration is copied from /usr/share into /etc/vuurmuur/textdir
- at removal, the firewall configuration is left unchanged into /etc/vuurmuur/textdir
- help files converted to utf-8
- licenses added

valr commented on 2010-04-03 15:54

Yes, I see the problem.
I'm gonna check how to fix this.

sirocco commented on 2010-04-03 14:34

I have tried to make vuurmuur 0.7-5 on system on which there is no established vuurmuur. Making has come to the end successfully.

On system where the package does not compiled, is installed vuurmuur 0.5.73. May be it a reason.

valr commented on 2010-04-02 17:09

Well, I've tried a full reinstall without problem.
Do the previous version compile on your system ?

Previous version:
PKGBUILD: http://aur.pastebin.com/6ge5WeJp
rc.vuurmuur: http://aur.pastebin.com/AMQfvzdP

valr commented on 2010-04-01 17:20

Strange, never had that problem.
I'll have a look at it.

sirocco commented on 2010-04-01 10:54

Can't compile. Last lines:
...
checking for vuurmuur.h... yes
checking for libvuurmuur_get_version in -lvuurmuur... no

ERROR! libvuurmuur library not found, go get it from
http://www.vuurmuur.org/

fukawi2 commented on 2010-03-25 21:08

Done... Enjoy him, I'm sure he'll grow to love you :P

valr commented on 2010-03-25 21:06

Please, do...and I will adopt that poor orphaned package :)
Thxs

valr commented on 2010-03-25 21:06

Please, do...and I will adopt that poor orphaned package :)
Thxs

fukawi2 commented on 2010-03-25 21:05

I don't use vuurmuur these days, so I'm happy to disown the package if you'd like to adopt it? :)

valr commented on 2010-03-25 21:04

Hi,

Stupid me, I've created a PKGBUILD without checking if there was one existing in AUR before. So, thanks for the PKGBUILD ;-)
I have anyway find some differences I would like to share with you & few errors.

1. the below files appear twice in the 'backup' array of the PKGBUILD:
'etc/vuurmuur/textdir/rules/blocklist.conf'
'etc/vuurmuur/textdir/rules/rules.conf'
2. could you install the logrotate script that is provided with the package ?
3. the 'install.sh' script in the source tarball creates a vuurmuur_conf file which is not included in/created by the PKGBUILD. Could you install it also ?
4. I have used another way of building vuurmuur & vuurmuur_conf to avoid invalid rpath problem. Should you be interested, please find the link to my PKGBUILD below.
5. I removed also the useless doc directory as it only included explanations on how to install vuurmuur on other distros.
6. During install & config, I had no problem linked to the file traffic.log, so I've not included it in my PKGBUILD.
7. Regarding the dependencies, all the ones mentionned are in base or base-devel so I find useless to mention them in the PKGBUILD. However, the real dependencies to be mentionned are iptables (not in the PKGBUILD), iproute2 (ok), conntrack-tools (not mentionned in the PKGBUILD and not in official repo, but in aur). These are the tools checked by the 'install.sh' script.

Cheers

PKGBUILD: http://aur.pastebin.com/GjE8FgqB
rc.vuurmur: http://aur.pastebin.com/yJFJyrVv

valr commented on 2010-03-25 20:56

Hi,

Stupid me, I've created a PKGBUILD without checking it was existing in AUR before. So, thanks for the PKGBUILD.
I have anyway find some differences I would like to share with you + few errors.

1. the below files appear twice in the 'backup' array:
'etc/vuurmuur/textdir/rules/blocklist.conf'
'etc/vuurmuur/textdir/rules/rules.conf'
2. shouldn't you install the logrotate script that is provided with the package ?
3. the 'install.sh' script in the source tarball creates a vuurmuur_conf file which is not included in/created by the PKGBUILD. Could you install it also ?
4. I have used another way of building vuurmuur & vuurmuur_conf to avoid invalid rpath problem. Should you be interested, please find the link to my PKGBUILD below.
5. I removed also the useless doc directory as it only included explanation on how to install vuurmuur on other distro.
6. During install & config, I had no problem linked to the file traffic.log, so I've not included it in my PKGBUILD.

Cheers

PKGBUILD: http://aur.pastebin.com/GjE8FgqB
rc.vuurmur: http://aur.pastebin.com/yJFJyrVv