Package Details: wavebox 10.124.31_2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/wavebox.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: wavebox
Description: The next generation of web-desktop communication
Upstream URL: https://wavebox.io
Keywords: gmail o365 outlook wavebox
Licenses: custom:Wavebox-EULA
Conflicts: wavebox-beta, wavebox-bin, wavebox-bin-beta
Submitter: lots0logs
Maintainer: tomwavebox
Last Packager: tomwavebox
Votes: 30
Popularity: 0.83
First Submitted: 2020-01-21 05:16 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-10 08:16 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

pioneer commented on 2020-03-05 11:40 (UTC)

@qubozik Thanks, it works now.

qubozik commented on 2020-03-05 04:06 (UTC)

@pioneer, this is fixed.

pioneer commented on 2020-03-05 01:53 (UTC)

I'm having the following error on my latest Manjaro:

$ pamac update -a Preparing... Cloning wavebox build files... Checking wavebox dependencies... ==== AUTHENTICATING FOR org.manjaro.pamac.commit ==== Authentication is required to install, update, or remove packages Authenticating as: Serge Tarkovski (pioneer) Password: ==== AUTHENTICATION COMPLETE ==== Синхронизация баз данных пакетов... Обновление core.db...
Обновление extra.db...
Обновление community.db...
Обновление multilib.db...
Error: pamac_aur database is inconsistent: name mismatch on package wavebox-10.0.104
Error: pamac_aur database is inconsistent: version mismatch on package wavebox-10.0.104 Nothing to do. Transaction successfully finished.

While trying to build the package manually, the error is as follows:

$ makepkg -sri ==> ERROR: pkgver is not allowed to contain colons, forward slashes, hyphens or whitespace.

qubozik commented on 2020-03-04 20:19 (UTC)

Updated version information.

qubozik commented on 2020-03-04 20:12 (UTC)

Updated MD5. The issue appears to be resolved and the app installs.

qubozik commented on 2020-03-02 04:23 (UTC)

Thanks for this. Just FYI the package install is failing due to MD5:

:: Checking for conflicts... :: Checking for inner conflicts... [Aur: 1] wavebox-10.0.86_2-1

:: Downloaded PKGBUILD (1/1): wavebox 1 wavebox (Build Files Exist) ==> Diffs to show? ==> [N]one [A]ll [Ab]ort [I]nstalled [No]tInstalled or (1 2 3, 1-3, ^4) ==> N :: Parsing SRCINFO (1/1): wavebox ==> Making package: wavebox 10.0.86_2-1 (Sun 01 Mar 2020 11:09:57 PM EST) ==> Retrieving sources... -> Downloading wavebox-10.0.86_2.tar.gz... % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- 0:00:02 --:--:-- 0 100 82.3M 100 82.3M 0 0 3435k 0 0:00:24 0:00:24 --:--:-- 5214k -> Found wavebox.appdata.xml -> Found wavebox.menu -> Found LICENSE ==> Validating source files with md5sums... wavebox-10.0.86_2.tar.gz ... FAILED wavebox.appdata.xml ... Passed wavebox.menu ... Passed LICENSE ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! Error downloading sources: wavebox

bryanOmalley commented on 2020-01-21 23:07 (UTC)

Oh and wavebox 10 is now on the AUR (and running smoothly on my machine at least): https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/wavebox/

kris7t commented on 2020-01-21 23:04 (UTC) (edited on 2020-01-22 00:53 (UTC) by kris7t)

Note that this package is not currently out of date, as Wavebox10 is no longer an open source projects, and thus cannot be considered equivalent to "Wavebox Classic": https://github.com/wavebox/waveboxapp/issues/1132 The developers decided they "[wi]ll be pushing patch releases to Wavebox Classic until everyone's in a position to move across to Wavebox 10." Therefore, this package should probably be renamed to wavebox-classic-bin (and updated when said patch releases become available). However, this is probably not a stable plan forward, as support and security patches will eventually run out, and we'll have to move to another application (or to a closed source tool that cannot really be trusted any more).

tiukov commented on 2020-01-20 11:04 (UTC)

Please update package: -> Flagged Out Of Date AUR Packages: wavebox-bin

bryanOmalley commented on 2020-01-14 09:40 (UTC)

@schmunk I'd also like that. There's a tarball on their site and they wrote about putting it on AUR, but that was like a month ago.