Package Details: weboob-git 3.0.r73.gfd7610aaa-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/weboob-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: weboob-git
Description: Core library and modules for Web Outside of Browsers
Upstream URL: https://weboob.org
Licenses: LGPL3
Conflicts: weboob-headless
Provides: weboob-headless
Replaces: weboob-headless
Submitter: maturain
Maintainer: CoiledSpring
Last Packager: CoiledSpring
Votes: 29
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2010-08-06 22:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2021-05-01 15:49 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »

sputnick commented on 2014-09-22 11:12 (UTC)

PKGBUILD updated

laurentb commented on 2014-05-23 18:13 (UTC)

You should also update the dependencies from the latest 0.i. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/weboob/

ianux commented on 2014-05-22 15:58 (UTC)

This PKGBUILD is outdated (stuck on 0.d branch). Here is an up-to-date version: http://pastebin.com/GRZG8t4q

sputnick commented on 2013-10-15 20:34 (UTC)

pkgver() added. PKGBUILD will be updated only on versions changes.

Scimmia commented on 2013-10-11 22:04 (UTC)

For the pacman 4.1 updates, I mean the link josephgbr gave you months ago: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/VCS_PKGBUILD_Guidelines Short version: stop doing the clone manually and add a pkgver function. As for the automated update, why?!?!? That does nothing but annoy your users, you only need to update the PKGBUILD when something important changes. I know that if I was a user, I would have abandoned this package months ago and just maintained my own locally.

sputnick commented on 2013-10-11 09:26 (UTC)

@Scimmia: this is an automated update. What do you mean by "still not updated for pacman 4.1" ?

Scimmia commented on 2013-10-11 07:03 (UTC)

So two useless updates later, still no response.

Scimmia commented on 2013-10-09 05:20 (UTC)

I see this in the recent packages feed all of the time and have to ask, why is the package updated so often? Dep changes? And why is it still not updated for pacman 4.1?

sputnick commented on 2013-08-05 22:00 (UTC)

I don't find any remplacement for python2-qt, it was removed. Feel free to update the thread if something's missing.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »