Arch Linux User Repository

WeChat will soon split into 2 packages. While wechat-bin will be the new "vanilla" version, this package will revert back to the original state and automatically set env vars for input method, HiDPI and more. The sandbox will still remain optional in this package, though.

分享文档时, 请先将📃放入数据目录: 右键应用程序图标, 选择 Open WeChat Data 或手动打开 "${XDG_DATA_HOME}"/WeChat_Data (默认为 ~/.local/share/WeChat_Data), 微信会将这个目录作为家目录.

WeChat_Data/portable.env 中的环境变量将会自动导入至微信.

不支持纯 Wayland 环境, 微信并未构建 Wayland 模块.

若要查看使用手册, 访问 https://wiki.archlinuxcn.org/wiki/WeChat

For user manual and internal document, consult https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/WeChat

KDE Plasma 添加阴影

1.添加阴影

在微信界面，ALT+F3 -> 更多操作 -> 配置特殊窗口设置 -> 添加属性 -> 添加 外观和修正 下面的 无标题栏和边框 -> 将 初始状态应用 改为 强制，将后面的 是 切换称 否 -> 应用

2.去除标题栏

之后微信就有边框阴影了，但是微信多了个标题栏。

设置 -> 颜色和主题 -> 窗口装饰元素 -> 找到你在用的主题右下角的编辑 -> 切换到 特定窗口优先规则 -> 添加 -> 检测窗口属性... -> 选中微信窗口 直到 匹配正则表达式 那里出现 wechat -> 勾选 装饰选项 下面的 隐藏窗口标题栏 -> 确定 -> 应用

This naming is all really confusing.IMO just name a package wechat-vanilla or sth.

WeChat will soon split into 2 packages. While wechat-bin will be the new "vanilla" version, this package will revert back to the original state and automatically set env vars for input method, HiDPI and more. The sandbox will still remain optional in this package, though.

wechat-bin is deleted again. The AUR guideline is the problem https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines.

Quote: "Rules of submission: Check the AUR if the package already exists. If it is currently maintained, changes can be submitted in a comment for the maintainer's attention. If it is unmaintained or the maintainer is unresponsive, the package can be adopted and updated as required. Do not create duplicate packages."

Another Quote: "Rules of submission: Do not use replaces in an AUR PKGBUILD unless the package is to be renamed, for example when Ethereal became Wireshark. If the package is an alternate version of an already existing package, use conflicts (and provides if that package is required by others). The main difference is: after syncing (-Sy) pacman immediately wants to replace an installed, 'offending' package upon encountering a package with the matching replaces anywhere in its repositories; conflicts, on the other hand, is only evaluated when actually installing the package, which is usually the desired behavior because it is less invasive."

不明白，这么多人请求留着wechat-bin，为什么还有人一直请求删除，这是碍着谁眼了？

有人开小号又请求删除wechat-bin，MD逼得我不得不从wechat-bin转到wechat-universal-bwrap，好好一个社区弄的乌烟瘴气真是无语

https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/message/WZEQ26KYJWQ65MJKW6TUSS2VVNE46VNQ/

终于有人接力wechat-bin了，不见。

这样的打包真的非常丑陋，无论怎么解释，git历史是不会骗人的。

This packaging is really ugly. No matter how you explain it, git history will not lie.

https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=wechat&id=3a06a5b0372892557a3e38a7953ee9344f9e18cc

修改中文英文WIKI，将自己劣质的包放在第一个，借此误导新手使用。

Modify the Chinese and English WIKI and put your own low-quality package first to mislead novices.

https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/WeChat https://wiki.archlinuxcn.org/wiki/WeChat

不断的发送合并请求，违规使用replace其他人的包，对使用者造成了严重的困扰。

Constantly sending merge requests and illegally replacing other packages caused serious trouble to users.

受够了那货无穷无尽的合并了，把 PKGBUILD 文件写到英文 wiki 里面去了。中文 wiki 也是那货的天下。 https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/WeChat