Search Criteria
Package Details: weektodo-bin 2.2.0-6
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/weektodo-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | weektodo-bin |
| Description: | A Free and Open Source Weekly Planner. Stop prioritizing what's on your schedule and start scheduling your priorities.(Prebuilt version.Use system-wide electron) |
| Upstream URL: | https://weektodo.me/ |
| Keywords: | electron planner schedule weektodo |
| Licenses: | GPL-3.0-only |
| Conflicts: | weektodo |
| Provides: | weektodo |
| Submitter: | zxp19821005 |
| Maintainer: | zxp19821005 |
| Last Packager: | zxp19821005 |
| Votes: | 1 |
| Popularity: | 0.000000 |
| First Submitted: | 2023-02-22 01:34 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-04-11 08:57 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
Kazephil commented on 2024-03-17 00:20 (UTC)
Just noticed this. Thanks! The latest update went very smoothly.
zxp19821005 commented on 2024-03-12 01:01 (UTC)
@Kazephil All right,fixed it.The
electron25was in theextrarepo before,now I've changed the depends toelectron25-bin.Kazephil commented on 2024-03-11 09:36 (UTC)
@zxp19821005 Ah. Thanks. In that case, can I suggest making
electron25-binthe default dependency? Theelectron25package took forever to build in the last update.zxp19821005 commented on 2024-03-11 01:22 (UTC)
@Kazephil Please see : https://github.com/manuelernestog/weektodo/blob/afeb6523c5afc1820038f610f332168dbf81c499/package.json#L59 . It was builded by
Electron25,if you use other version of electron,the unpredictable issues may arise.Kazephil commented on 2024-03-09 00:43 (UTC)
I'm curious. Is it really necessary to pin Electron to version 25? The GitHub site only mentions requiring "a recent version", and everything seems to build fine if I change the package build to use the standard
electronpackage.