Package Details: wine-staging-git 8.2.r7.g7b0d44f8-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/wine-staging-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: wine-staging-git
Description: A compatibility layer for running Windows programs (staging branch, git version)
Upstream URL: https://www.wine-staging.com/
Keywords: staging windows wine
Licenses: LGPL
Conflicts: wine, wine-wow64
Provides: wine, wine-staging, wine-wow64
Submitter: dbermond
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 18
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2016-03-27 06:19 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-02-25 13:42 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »

dbermond commented on 2017-06-29 18:51 (UTC)

@Narthorn Thank you for reporting this. I'm glad that pkgver() is still giving the correct version, so the package itself is not affected. I'll be fixing it as soon as I can.

Narthorn commented on 2017-06-28 07:09 (UTC) (edited on 2017-06-28 07:13 (UTC) by Narthorn)

pkgver() fails to translate the latest-release git tag to 2.11, giving 2.9 instead. This can be fixed by using sort -Vr, or directly git tag --sort -v:refname.

dbermond commented on 2017-01-14 22:11 (UTC)

@Anthony25 Thank you for the report. It's building fine for me again too so probably it was an upstream issue.

Anthony25 commented on 2017-01-14 16:35 (UTC)

It's building without problem now, thanks again!

Anthony25 commented on 2017-01-11 12:41 (UTC)

@Bermond: Ok, thanks a lot for your answer, I didn't know if it was an upstream issue or a missing dependency to do the build. So I'll wait!

dbermond commented on 2017-01-11 00:17 (UTC) (edited on 2017-01-11 00:27 (UTC) by dbermond)

@Anthony25 I'm also getting this same error in latest builds during the 64-bit compilation phase. It seems to be not specific for this package since this same problem is happening to me with wine-git AUR package as well. Also, as you can see, wine-staging x86_64 repository package was not updated to 2.0 rc4 while i686 was updated, hinting that maybe some problem may have occurred in 64-bit builds for the latest version. So this seems to be an upstream problem and maybe 64-bit specific. Let's wait some days and see if it is fixed by upstream since 2.0 release is getting closer. If you have a clue or any other view please share your thoughts.

dbermond commented on 2017-01-10 23:35 (UTC)

@ProfessorKaos64 Thanks for appreciating :)

Anthony25 commented on 2017-01-10 18:29 (UTC)

Hello, Since a few days, in a clean-chroot or not, I get this error while compiling: ``` macro.lex.yy.o: In function `yylex': macro.lex.yy.c:(.text+0xf3d): undefined reference to `yywrap' ```

ProfessorKaos64 commented on 2016-12-17 22:59 (UTC)

Thanks for putting this up

dbermond commented on 2016-04-13 21:00 (UTC)

@Xylemon Done.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »