Package Details: wolframengine 14.0.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/wolframengine.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: wolframengine
Description: Free Wolfram Engine(TM) for Developers
Upstream URL: https://www.wolfram.com/engine/
Licenses: proprietary
Provides: wolfram, wolframplayer, wolframscript
Submitter: shunkflake
Maintainer: TaXules
Last Packager: TaXules
Votes: 5
Popularity: 0.031974
First Submitted: 2021-03-20 15:29 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-02-18 22:37 (UTC)

Dependencies (37)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

TaXules commented on 2023-08-24 14:14 (UTC)

The hash is good but the source link is not (it still downloads the 13.2.0). I’ve fixed it, testing it right now.

chao_chao commented on 2023-08-24 10:55 (UTC)

version 13.3.0, hash mismatch

AsukaMinato commented on 2023-04-07 19:59 (UTC)

LANG=C paru -Qo /usr/bin/wolframplayer
/usr/bin/wolframplayer is owned by wolframengine 13.2.0-1

LANG=C paru -Qo /usr/bin/wolfram 
/usr/bin/wolfram is owned by wolframengine 13.2.0-1
provides=("wolframscript" "wolframplayer" "wolfram")

TaXules commented on 2023-03-12 17:54 (UTC)

@tommycui If it is not created by Wolfram installer, I cannot fix it. But maybe there is an specific option I did not find. Please suggest a fix.

tomnycui commented on 2023-03-12 08:29 (UTC)

Issue: Cannot find libWSTP64i4.a for WSTP developing, Only libWSTP64i4.so is found.

AsukaMinato commented on 2023-02-15 16:44 (UTC)

mkdir -p ${pkgdir}/usr/share/license/WolframEngine/

according to https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#license

mkdir -p ${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/WolframEngine/

license -> licenses

linzuxuan commented on 2022-11-27 13:25 (UTC)

13.1.0 is released, please update.

garid3000 commented on 2022-11-25 07:55 (UTC)

I got following validity-error, while trying to install:

$ yay -S wolframengine
:: Checking for conflicts...
:: Checking for inner conflicts...
[Aur:1]  wolframengine-13.0.1-1

  1 wolframengine                    (Build Files Exist)
==> Packages to cleanBuild?
==> [N]one [A]ll [Ab]ort [I]nstalled [No]tInstalled or (1 2 3, 1-3, ^4)
==>
:: PKGBUILD up to date, Skipping (1/0): wolframengine
  1 wolframengine                    (Build Files Exist)
==> Diffs to show?
==> [N]one [A]ll [Ab]ort [I]nstalled [No]tInstalled or (1 2 3, 1-3, ^4)
==>
:: (1/1) Parsing SRCINFO: wolframengine
==> Making package: wolframengine 13.0.1-1 (Fri 25 Nov 2022 04:54:39 PM JST)
==> Retrieving sources...
  -> Found WolframEngine_13.0.1_LINUX.sh
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    WolframEngine_13.0.1_LINUX.sh ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
 -> error downloading sources: wolframengine
         context: exit status 1


==> Making package: wolframengine 13.0.1-1 (Fri 25 Nov 2022 04:54:43 PM JST)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Checking buildtime dependencies...
==> Retrieving sources...
  -> Found WolframEngine_13.0.1_LINUX.sh
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    WolframEngine_13.0.1_LINUX.sh ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
 -> error making: wolframengine

TaXules commented on 2021-07-23 19:07 (UTC)

I rewrite the PKGBUILD based on mathematica’s one. There is probably some work to do on the dependencie list. However, it is impossible to fix namcap errors as we don’t compile the code.

xlucn commented on 2021-04-08 06:49 (UTC)

This PKGBUILD has several issues (path related) that causes makepkg to fail. Even worse, if those are fixed, namcap check generates 30000+ lines of warning/error messages for the package file. Maybe someone can create a PKGBUILD based on the one of mathematica AUR package, the installation should be similar.