I try my best to always follow all of the Arch package guidelines.
If you think I've missed something or have suggestions, you can:
- Submit a PR or create an issue in my PKGBUILDs repo
- Drop a comment here
- Email me
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/wootility-appimage.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | wootility-appimage |
Description: | Utility for configuring Wooting keyboards |
Upstream URL: | https://wooting.io/wootility |
Keywords: | configuration keyboards wootility wooting |
Licenses: | unknown |
Conflicts: | wootility |
Provides: | wootility |
Submitter: | Freso |
Maintainer: | AlphaLynx |
Last Packager: | AlphaLynx |
Votes: | 15 |
Popularity: | 1.00 |
First Submitted: | 2018-07-14 18:07 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-06-28 23:57 (UTC) |
I try my best to always follow all of the Arch package guidelines.
If you think I've missed something or have suggestions, you can:
@Quokka after this was orphaned (this request), I've adopted and updated it to the latest v5, and I'll continue to update it going forwards. I think we should now merge wootilty5-appimage into this package
Please create and merge this to wootility4-appimage so wootility5-appimage can be merged into this package.
Hi! v5.0.0 Stable was released yesterday. Are you planning on updating this package to v5.0.0 and upwards?
@Freso We don't actually return a 403 Forbidden anywhere in the route handlers for that api. We also have no blocklist of Tor nodes or other such things. The best I can imagine is that DigitalOcean has some IPs blocked that may also be Tor Nodes which we can't influence.
@BigBrainAFK I’d love to switch to using your API for this! Is there a chance you’d stop 403’ing requests from Tor exit nodes (at the very least for this endpoint)?
That version
query parameter seems a lot nicer to me than directly accessing the S3 bucket. At the very least it's obviously trustworthy while reading the PKGBUILD with no verification needed. Thanks @BigBrainAFK!
I'd personally vote for changing the URL in the PKGBUILD to the api.wooting.io
one.
@Freso / @shaybox, thoughts?
@Micha @Freso @shaybox
Not entirely sure who to tag here but our API does support fetching specific versions of Wootility without a raw AWS URI.
You can use the query parameter version
to specify which version you want from our API. This way you don't have to use some AWS URI that people can only verify by curl-ing or downloading it themselves from us at Wooting and then checking if the AWS URIs match or not.
For example:
https://api.wooting.io/public/wootility/download?os=linux&branch=lekker&version=4.6.20
Another example
https://api.wooting.io/public/wootility/download?os=linux&branch=lekker&version=4.6.6
@Micha Wooting stores their AppImage inside a S3 bucket, you can verify it yourself by following the link from their website. e.g. curl -i https://api.wooting.io/public/wootility/download?os=linux&branch=lekker
Pinned Comments
AlphaLynx commented on 2025-06-29 03:27 (UTC) (edited on 2025-06-29 03:50 (UTC) by AlphaLynx)
I try my best to always follow all of the Arch package guidelines.
If you think I've missed something or have suggestions, you can: