Package Details: xdm-arch-theme 2.3.2-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/xdm-arch-theme.git (read-only)
Package Base: xdm-arch-theme
Description: An Arch Linux theme for xdm.
Upstream URL: https://gitlab.com/the_isz/xdm-arch-theme
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: the_isz
Maintainer: the_isz
Last Packager: the_isz
Votes: 27
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2009-06-21 11:53
Last Updated: 2019-03-07 20:57

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

the_isz commented on 2011-09-15 11:20

Version 2.2.3

+ Added support for height 900 (thanks to Ivy)

the_isz commented on 2011-09-13 18:08

Version 2.2.2

+ Added support for width 768 (thanks to B)
+ Package sources are now hosted on github

Anonymous comment on 2011-09-13 08:38

Sorry, 768

the_isz commented on 2011-09-03 20:09

Hey B,

which one is correct now, 766 or 768?

Anonymous comment on 2011-09-02 17:41

Hi,

Could you add a line for 766 px height in Xresources as well?

This works nicely for me:

#elif ( HEIGHT == 768 )
# define LOGIN_POS_Y 520

Thanks :)

the_isz commented on 2010-10-27 19:32

Foucault:

Ok, that sounds reasonable. Thanks for taking your time to explain. So, as long
as xorg-utils still conflicts with xorg-xwininfo I'll keep the latter as
dependency. As far as I could see, the other packages don't conflict in the same
way, so I'll keep them the way they are.

cyberpatrol:

Foucoult already referred to those posts, but thanks for pointing out anyway.

Anonymous comment on 2010-10-27 13:51

Maybe you guys should read these mails on the mailing list arch-dev-public:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-October/018235.html
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2010-October/018248.html

Foucault commented on 2010-10-27 08:58

Obviously, the PKGBUILD works if you remove xorg-utils. The thing is, currently, some of the xorg-utils programs are provided by both xorg-utils and several other split packages. Since, probably most users have already xorg-utils installed I thought it would be more logical to stick to the older package instead of running to a similar conflict. I don't know why the packages are like that currently in [extra] and I'm in no position to judge this. However, I believe it would be wiser to try to adapt AUR PKGBUILDs to the current state of the repositories. xorg-utils is *still* required by a couple official packages http://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/i686/xorg-utils/. None requires xorg-xwininfo. Since one has to remove xorg-utils to install xorg-xwininfo (since they conflict) they will have to remove all packages that depend upon xorg-utils (including kdebase-workspace!). If you don't want to change the PKGBUILD it's fine, but if someone needs xorg-utils as a dependency for another package MUST edit the xorg-xwininfo part out and replace it with xorg-utils.

Just my input. Take it, or leave it :P

the_isz commented on 2010-10-27 08:10

Now I'm confused... why would an Arch dev commit an unfinished change to the
stable repository? Bad dev! :P

Well, I tested the PKGBUILD and it worked for me, so can you two by any chance
see if 'pacman -Rsc xdm-arch-theme', 'pacman -Sy' and reinstalling
xdm-arch-theme helps? I wouldn't want to change the PKGBUILD back as a
work-around if it's the repo which is wrong and not the PKGBUILD...

Foucault commented on 2010-10-26 22:48

I believe the xwininfo dependency should not be updated yet, since the transition is not completed as stated here: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/21482 . At least for now, I think it's better to have xorg-utils instead of xorg-xwininfo.