Package Details: xnviewmp 1.7.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/xnviewmp.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: xnviewmp
Description: An efficient multimedia viewer, browser and converter.
Upstream URL: https://www.xnview.com/en/xnviewmp/
Keywords: graphics
Licenses: custom
Submitter: oliwer
Maintainer: Corax
Last Packager: Corax
Votes: 301
Popularity: 6.74
First Submitted: 2008-07-25 19:01 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-09 18:52 (UTC)

Dependencies (2)

Required by (0)

Sources (2)

Pinned Comments

Corax commented on 2017-01-21 15:34 (UTC) (edited on 2017-02-12 19:23 (UTC) by Corax)

I have created a new package: xnviewmp-system-libs. This is exactly the same build, except that the bundled Qt/icu libs are removed. Please try it if you want to use XnView without the bundled libs, and discuss any issue related to this configuration here: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xnviewmp-system-libs/. Do keep in mind that this is an experimental package though, and things may break when I try to fix other things...

Corax commented on 2017-01-20 21:49 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-30 20:39 (UTC) by Corax)

If makepkg fails because the checksum is incorrect, please flag the package out-of-date and I will update the PKGBUILD.

The PKGBUILD now references the latest versioned archive, as a result of which it should keep working if a new version is released. However, upstream sometimes updates released archives in place, in which case the checksum will fail and a manual intervention is required.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 26 Next › Last »

PhotonX commented on 2021-02-22 11:02 (UTC) (edited on 2021-02-22 11:04 (UTC) by PhotonX)

For me it fails for the release file:

XnViewMP-linux-x64_0.98.1-rel1.tgz ... FAILED

xnviewmp.desktop ... Passed

Corax commented on 2021-02-21 15:59 (UTC)

@rratul: I unflagged the package because the checksum failure you get is on xnviewmp.desktop, which doesn't make sense as it's part of the package and I didn't change it. Try to delete the AUR repo and start again.

mrjayviper commented on 2020-12-15 13:57 (UTC)

@ax34 I think it's already been flagged by someone else. I'm new to using arch/aur. Thank you.

ax34 commented on 2020-12-15 13:25 (UTC) (edited on 2020-12-15 13:26 (UTC) by ax34)

@mrjayviper,

"If makepkg fails because the checksum is incorrect, please flag the package out-of-date and I will update the PKGBUILD"

mrjayviper commented on 2020-12-15 12:04 (UTC)

can you please fix the checksum? I cannot install it. Thanks

Xenx commented on 2020-10-19 09:19 (UTC)

@Corax: yes, everything works. thanks

Corax commented on 2020-10-18 20:39 (UTC)

@Xenx: I'm very sorry, I thought I had updated just after it was marked out-of-date, but stupidly I committed without pushing >.< The package should now be up-to-date!

Xenx commented on 2020-10-18 20:01 (UTC)

Hey. There was an error installing or updating a package, can you fix it? ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!