@spsf64: sorry for that, I failed to realise that as well as updating the Qt5 libs, 1.4.0 moved from qt5-webkit to qt5-webengine. I've updated the dependencies accordingly. BTW you are right that these qt5-* dependencies are not strictly needed for this package, as we use the packaged libs, they are simply a lazy way to pull in all their own dependencies :)
Search Criteria
Package Details: xnviewmp 1.8.0-2
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/xnviewmp.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | xnviewmp |
| Description: | An efficient multimedia viewer, browser and converter. |
| Upstream URL: | https://www.xnview.com/en/xnviewmp/ |
| Keywords: | graphics |
| Licenses: | custom |
| Submitter: | oliwer |
| Maintainer: | Corax |
| Last Packager: | Corax |
| Votes: | 307 |
| Popularity: | 2.51 |
| First Submitted: | 2008-07-25 19:01 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-09-03 14:45 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- qt5-multimedia
- glib2 (glib2-gitAUR, glib2-selinuxAUR, glib2-patched-thumbnailerAUR) (optional) – support for moving files to trash
Required by (0)
Sources (2)
Corax commented on 2022-12-18 08:09 (UTC)
spsf64 commented on 2022-12-17 14:24 (UTC)
@Ccorax, is qt5-webkit (which was recently moved to AUR) really needed? I compiled ver 1.4.0 without it and it's running perfectly! I did not find any crippled function, yet...lol! Thanks for maintaining this package. ps. maybe it is only needed for system-libs package?
daviding commented on 2022-09-07 02:21 (UTC) (edited on 2022-09-07 02:24 (UTC) by daviding)
The update from 1.01-1 to 1.01-2 fails.
Building xnviewmp... ==> Making package: xnviewmp 1.02-1 (Tue 06 Sep 2022 10:18:23 PM) ==> Checking runtime dependencies... ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... ==> Retrieving sources... -> Found XnViewMP-linux-x64_1.02-rel1.tgz -> Found xnviewmp.desktop ==> Validating source files with sha256sums... XnViewMP-linux-x64_1.02-rel1.tgz ... FAILED xnviewmp.desktop ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! Failed to build xnviewmp
infested999 commented on 2022-05-04 12:28 (UTC)
PKGBuild is out of date again. Correct sha256sum is '3BC29C4F160D62BD2172C5BC7C6DFD793A2CAC921030BF767069618BB35DE44F'
Corax commented on 2022-01-22 19:52 (UTC)
Apologies for the delay updating the package, the 0.99.7 release happened at a very busy time for me, but I'm now back in business :)
Chaosmos commented on 2022-01-20 12:35 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-20 20:26 (UTC) by Chaosmos)
==> Validating source files with sha256sums... XnViewMP-linux-x64_0.99.6-rel1.tgz ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! Failed to build xnviewmp
flan_suse commented on 2021-09-23 13:29 (UTC)
Important bugfixes from 0.99.0 -> 0.99.1
I see someone already marked this (0.99.0) as out of date. =)
Corax commented on 2021-06-14 21:52 (UTC)
@djmattyg007: I hadn't even noticed the PKGBUILD was using HTTP URLs, thanks for the heads-up! That's probably because upstream is using HTTP URLs everywhere... Anyway, I've updated the URLs.
djmattyg007 commented on 2021-06-14 03:42 (UTC)
Please update the upstream URL and the source download URL to use HTTPS.
Pinned Comments
Corax commented on 2017-01-21 15:34 (UTC) (edited on 2017-02-12 19:23 (UTC) by Corax)
Corax commented on 2017-01-20 21:49 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-30 20:39 (UTC) by Corax)
If makepkg fails because the checksum is incorrect, please flag the package out-of-date and I will update the PKGBUILD.
The PKGBUILD now references the latest versioned archive, as a result of which it should keep working if a new version is released. However, upstream sometimes updates released archives in place, in which case the checksum will fail and a manual intervention is required.