==> Validating source files with sha256sums... XnViewMP-linux-x64_0.99.6-rel1.tgz ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! Failed to build xnviewmp
Search Criteria
Package Details: xnviewmp 1.8.2-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/xnviewmp.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | xnviewmp |
| Description: | An efficient multimedia viewer, browser and converter. |
| Upstream URL: | https://www.xnview.com/en/xnviewmp/ |
| Keywords: | graphics |
| Licenses: | custom |
| Submitter: | oliwer |
| Maintainer: | Corax |
| Last Packager: | Corax |
| Votes: | 310 |
| Popularity: | 2.98 |
| First Submitted: | 2008-07-25 19:01 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-10-19 21:05 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- qt5-multimedia
- glib2 (glib2-gitAUR, glib2-selinuxAUR, glib2-patched-thumbnailerAUR) (optional) – support for moving files to trash
Required by (0)
Sources (2)
Chaosmos commented on 2022-01-20 12:35 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-20 20:26 (UTC) by Chaosmos)
flan_suse commented on 2021-09-23 13:29 (UTC)
Important bugfixes from 0.99.0 -> 0.99.1
I see someone already marked this (0.99.0) as out of date. =)
Corax commented on 2021-06-14 21:52 (UTC)
@djmattyg007: I hadn't even noticed the PKGBUILD was using HTTP URLs, thanks for the heads-up! That's probably because upstream is using HTTP URLs everywhere... Anyway, I've updated the URLs.
djmattyg007 commented on 2021-06-14 03:42 (UTC)
Please update the upstream URL and the source download URL to use HTTPS.
Corax commented on 2021-05-16 18:29 (UTC)
@zw963: I wish I could do something about that, but this is beyond my control! The source tarball is indeed pretty big, but this is actually explained by the fact that it contains most of the libraries XnView MP depends on: the libs directory represents about 75% of the total size (uncompressed). I don't think this is something that upstream would easily accept to change, because the only supported way to run XnView MP is using those packaged libs. Note that I maintain another package (xnviewmp-system-libs) that allows you to get rid of those libs and use the system ones instead, but it doesn't change the fact that you need to download the full source tarball.
zw963 commented on 2021-05-16 04:33 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-16 04:35 (UTC) by zw963)
XnViewMP-linux-x64_0.98.3-rel1.tgz, this source file is too too big to download for a just a picture viewer, just because it include some big demo video/image into this source code packaged file, right?
==> Making package: xnviewmp 0.98.3-1 (Sun 16 May 2021 12:30:09 PM CST)
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Downloading XnViewMP-linux-x64_0.98.3-rel1.tgz...
% Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
100 343 100 343 0 0 436 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 435
100 73.3M 100 73.3M 0 0 2992k 0 0:00:25 0:00:25 --:--:-- 5433k
could you please optimize for a more small size?
thank you!
je42 commented on 2021-05-06 20:12 (UTC)
Tried to install the package with yay -S xnviewm but it failed:
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Found XnViewMP-linux-x64_0.98.2-rel1.tgz
-> Found xnviewmp.desktop
==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
XnViewMP-linux-x64_0.98.2-rel1.tgz ... FAILED
xnviewmp.desktop ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
Corax commented on 2021-02-22 18:54 (UTC)
@PhotonX: by a complete coincidence, 0.98.2 got released today, which explains why the checksum failed on the archive :) I've now updated the PKGBUILD.
PhotonX commented on 2021-02-22 11:02 (UTC) (edited on 2021-02-22 11:04 (UTC) by PhotonX)
For me it fails for the release file:
XnViewMP-linux-x64_0.98.1-rel1.tgz ... FAILED
xnviewmp.desktop ... Passed
Pinned Comments
Corax commented on 2017-01-21 15:34 (UTC) (edited on 2017-02-12 19:23 (UTC) by Corax)
Corax commented on 2017-01-20 21:49 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-30 20:39 (UTC) by Corax)
If makepkg fails because the checksum is incorrect, please flag the package out-of-date and I will update the PKGBUILD.
The PKGBUILD now references the latest versioned archive, as a result of which it should keep working if a new version is released. However, upstream sometimes updates released archives in place, in which case the checksum will fail and a manual intervention is required.