Search Criteria
Package Details: xone-dongle-firmware 1.0.46.1-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/xone-dongle-firmware.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | xone-dongle-firmware |
Description: | Xbox Wireless Controller Adapter firmware |
Upstream URL: | https://support.xbox.com/en-US/help/hardware-network/browse |
Licenses: | LicenseRef-Microsoft |
Submitter: | None |
Maintainer: | xiota |
Last Packager: | xiota |
Votes: | 18 |
Popularity: | 0.115012 |
First Submitted: | 2022-06-27 19:29 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-01-23 15:43 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
merlinf commented on 2025-01-24 17:42 (UTC)
@xiota could you please add yourself as maintainer in the PKGBUILD if you're assuming maintainership?
xiota commented on 2025-01-23 18:15 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-23 18:16 (UTC) by xiota)
Package needed maintainer action to align to package guidelines. The previous maintainer did not respond to a request for nine months, which is more than long enough to consider the package de facto unmaintained. Previous maintainer also has a long history of ignoring comments (see xone-dkms/-git). A comment from a few months ago notes that his email address was unreachable.
I stated that I was willing to add the previous maintainer as comaintainer. However, he appears to be disinterested since he has recently disowned the xone-dkms packages.
Lawstorant commented on 2025-01-23 17:58 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-23 17:59 (UTC) by Lawstorant)
Please only do this if the package needs maintainer action, the maintainer is MIA and you already tried to contact the maintainer previously.
While I agree, the package could have been updated and wasn't in the best state, you didn't do your due diligence as well.
xiota commented on 2025-01-23 17:54 (UTC)
Another user asked the previous maintainer to make changes to align to package guidelines. The request was ignored for a very long time (~9 months), so the orphan request was auto-approved.
I'm not against adding the previous maintainer back as comaintainer, but am less inclined to do so when attacked.
<deleted-account> commented on 2025-01-23 17:50 (UTC)
Huh I'd have appreciated an attempt to contact me first before declaring me MIA and immediately approving your own maintainer request.
Lawstorant commented on 2025-01-23 17:44 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-23 17:55 (UTC) by Lawstorant)
@xiota why was this package yanked from @mkopec? No attempt at contact? Package wasn't updated in a long time because there wasn't anything to update. Out of date notice was bogus
xiota commented on 2025-01-23 15:44 (UTC) (edited on 2025-01-23 15:48 (UTC) by xiota)
Switched to
w3m
for format conversion. Not bumping pkgrel because no need to rebuild.Those who who want to remove pandoc, along with its depends, may uninstall with
sudo pacman -Runcs pandoc-cli
.Building in clean chroot would prevent installation of unwanted makedeps.
Blu3wolf commented on 2025-01-23 09:03 (UTC)
Judging by the change history https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=xone-dongle-firmware&id=9159fed59f2644246baed62c86d983c9da5b5a0b
In this new PKGBUILD, pandoc is used to generate a single document during the build. I do wonder whether it would have been possible to avoid needing to pull in an additional 227 packages to write a terms-of-use document.
thingsiplay commented on 2025-01-23 07:41 (UTC)
@z0n I tried to deliberately avoid Haskell packages, but guess we have to accept it now. Not sure why that is suddenly a requirement (why pandoc-cli is I mean).
z0n commented on 2025-01-23 00:51 (UTC)
I was a bit surprised to see over 200 haskell-packages in my upgrade list today, turns out they are required for the pandoc-cli package which is required by this one :O
Isn't the license available as a txt already somewhere?
1 2 Next › Last »