Search Criteria
Package Details: xp-pen-tablet 3.4.9-231023
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/xp-pen-tablet.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | xp-pen-tablet |
Description: | XP-Pen (Official) Linux utility (New UI driver) |
Upstream URL: | https://www.xp-pen.com/download/index.html |
Keywords: | driver pen tablet xp xp-pen |
Licenses: | custom |
Submitter: | Poilrouge |
Maintainer: | labaman |
Last Packager: | labaman |
Votes: | 29 |
Popularity: | 0.47 |
First Submitted: | 2020-06-12 15:35 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-03-17 10:27 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 9 Next › Last »
OdinVex commented on 2023-11-05 15:48 (UTC)
@labaman, No, a broken package is one that can't compile, not whether a new one is available or not. His response was correct.
labaman commented on 2023-11-05 15:30 (UTC)
@ricwu It's not a broken package, it's just that a new version has been released. If you notice that a new version has been released, it is better to use the " Out of date " flag
ricwu commented on 2023-11-05 11:56 (UTC)
The package is currently broken. Changing the following fixed it for me:
labaman commented on 2023-09-12 17:48 (UTC)
In any case, the license type changes will be made in PKGBUILD on the next package update. Thank you all.
OdinVex commented on 2023-09-12 11:46 (UTC)
@labaman, I think it best this noise stays away from this AUR package, thanks though. >_>
rad4day commented on 2023-09-12 10:34 (UTC)
The license should probably be changed to LICENSE=('custom') and the EULA file should be packaged as
/usr/share/licenses/xp-pen-tablet/LICENSE
, if I read https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#license correctly.This patch should work. (funnily enough
git am
, etc die at this patch.patch -p1
works though o.O)labaman commented on 2023-09-12 09:49 (UTC)
So if at the next update, I change the license to "custom ELUA" - will everyone be happy?
rad4day commented on 2023-09-12 09:12 (UTC)
Let me chime in on this, as I made that change to the license entry. The version shipped at that time included the file:
xp-pen-pentablet-3.2.0.210824-1.x86_64/App/usr/lib/pentablet/LGPL
and not theusr/lib/pentablet/doc/EULA
file the current version has.So they seem to have “changed” the license sometime in between :/
labaman commented on 2023-09-12 07:59 (UTC) (edited on 2023-09-12 08:00 (UTC) by labaman)
@OdinVex, @alexandria this license type was specified in the package originally (before I started maintaining it). Seeing the current "noise" in the comments on this issue, I sent a request to xp-pen support. So far I haven't heard anything back. As soon as I get a response - in the next package updates the license type will be fixed according to xp-pen's response. For those who find this aspect critical, you can send parallel requests to xp-pen support - if you get an answer faster, please forward the support response to me.
OdinVex commented on 2023-09-11 17:41 (UTC)
@labaman, alexandria is correct, this is not LGPL in any way. It's closed-source and simply links to Qt.
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 9 Next › Last »