Search Criteria
Package Details: xpad-noone-git r8.6970c40-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/xpad-noone-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | xpad-noone-git |
Description: | This is the original upstream xpad driver from the Linux kernel with support for Xbox One controllers removed. |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/medusalix/xpad-noone |
Licenses: | GPL2 |
Conflicts: | xpad-dkms-git |
Provides: | xpad-noone |
Submitter: | rhoot |
Maintainer: | rhoot |
Last Packager: | rhoot |
Votes: | 2 |
Popularity: | 0.001607 |
First Submitted: | 2024-05-18 02:39 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-05-18 02:39 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
Lawstorant commented on 2025-08-14 10:10 (UTC)
xone maintainer here. Yes, this last one is what we now recommend and it has been set up with a scheduled github action that automatically rebases it on the xpad master. Automatically maintained!
wantija commented on 2025-08-03 05:04 (UTC)
Alright, the current xone recommends this fork now, seems like it is much easier to maintain according to this commit. https://github.com/forkymcforkface/xpad-noone
rhoot commented on 2025-06-27 06:47 (UTC)
On one hand, yes Medusalix hasn't updated the original repository in a year, and maybe it'd be good to get it updated. But on the other, I don't want to switch to an unknown fork that may or may not be maintained going forward simply because it has a newer version. Especially in a
-git
package where any new commits afterward would automatically get picked up.Looking at Jan's github history I'm not all too worried about whether or not the fork is trustworthy, but without a commitment of maintaining it going forward I'd rather leave this pointing at the original repository in the hope that Medusalix does eventually get around to updating it.
wantija commented on 2025-06-25 18:42 (UTC)
Medusalix the maintainer hasn't updated this in a while, can you change the url to this fork? https://github.com/Jan200101/xpad-noone