Sorry, I completely missed comments here. It is now updated to 2.1.25.
Search Criteria
Package Details: xsh 2.1.25-1
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/xsh.git (read-only) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | xsh |
| Description: | XSH - XML editing shell |
| Upstream URL: | http://xsh.sourceforge.net/ |
| Licenses: | |
| Submitter: | kkl2401 |
| Maintainer: | kkl2401 |
| Last Packager: | kkl2401 |
| Votes: | 5 |
| Popularity: | 0.001291 |
| First Submitted: | 2006-11-12 22:35 |
| Last Updated: | 2016-08-21 13:13 |
Dependencies (9)
- perl>=5.10.0 (perl-fake)
- perl-io-stringy
- perl-parse-recdescent
- perl-term-readline (perl)
- perl-uri
- perl-xml-filter-domfilter-libxml
- perl-xml-libxslt
- perl-xml-sax-writer
- perl-xml-xupdate-libxml
Required by (0)
Sources (1)
Latest Comments
kkl2401 commented on 2016-08-21 13:14
frostering commented on 2016-02-25 12:51
Outdated url.
Editing PKGBUILD to 2.1.25 version and updating md5sum to 98d4d1124f59c854a873ceb594cd816d works fine.
sinisterstuf commented on 2015-05-29 13:49
This package depends on perl-uri to run. The test fails without it and indeed it crashes without it. It would be good to include it in the depends list.
kkl2401 commented on 2014-08-21 19:24
Updated to 2.1.17.
jamesan: Regarding this and all the other packages you commented on: it depends on what you call a bug. Yes, the PKGBUILDs contain some constructions that are no longer recommended. On the other hands the packages still build (at least the one I randomly chose and tried; if some of them don't, let me know). I'm happy to update the PKGBUILD when it needs modifying anyway (e.g. there is a new version like with this one). But I see no point in updating a functioning PKGBUILD for a library that hasn't changed in years, just because the build function should be officially split to build and package.
Also, I don't think the package should be renamed to perl-xml-xsh. Even though technically you could say it is a perl module, it is first and foremost a standalone perl application. Those don't follow these naming conventions, those are called as the application itself is called.
jamesan commented on 2014-08-21 02:27
The PKGBUILD has a couple bugs, like not specifying a required package() function and also doing packaging and checking in build() rather than their respective package() and check() functions.
I've updated the PKGBUILD to 2,1,17, viewable here:
https://github.com/jamesan/aur-pkgs/blob/master/perl-xml-xsh/PKGBUILD
I also think this package should be renamed to perl-xml-xsh to be in line with other perl packages that are named by appending the lowercase of their module name to "perl-".
I'd happily take over this AUR package if kk12401 no longer wants to take this on.
jamesan commented on 2014-08-21 02:26
The PKGBUILD has a couple bugs, like not specifying a required package() function and also doing packaging and checking in build() rather than their respective package() and check() functions.
I've updated the PKGBUILD, viewable here:
https://github.com/jamesan/aur-pkgs/blob/master/perl-xml-xsh/PKGBUILD
I also think this package should be renamed to perl-xml-xsh to be in line with other perl packages that are named by appending the lowercase of their module name to "perl-".
I'd happily take over this AUR package if kk12401 no longer wants to take this on.
kkl2401 commented on 2013-10-13 19:42
Updated to 2.1.12.
pdxleif commented on 2013-09-02 21:04
2.1.7 is out. 2.1.6 seems to have been broken by dependency upgrades:
"Can't call method "at" on an undefined value at /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Parse/RecDescent.pm line 3159"
But 2.1.7 works fine.
kkl2401 commented on 2012-03-03 18:39
Updated to 2.1.6. Works for me here.
kkl2401 commented on 2012-02-27 02:39
Seems there's version 2.1.6 on CPAN, I'm flagging this out of date. I hope I'll be able to try to make the new version work in the following days.