Search Criteria
Package Details: ytt 0.50.0-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/ytt.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | ytt |
Description: | YAML templating tool that works on YAML structure instead of text |
Upstream URL: | https://carvel.dev/ytt |
Licenses: | Apache-2.0 |
Provides: | ytt |
Submitter: | jfchevrette |
Maintainer: | gtsiam (Zebradil) |
Last Packager: | Zebradil |
Votes: | 1 |
Popularity: | 0.000005 |
First Submitted: | 2019-04-16 00:15 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-07-17 00:26 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- bash (bash-devel-static-gitAUR, bash-devel-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR, bash-gitAUR) (make)
- go (go-gitAUR, gcc-go-gitAUR, gcc-go-snapshotAUR, gcc-go) (make)
- zip (zip-natspecAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
Zebradil commented on 2024-02-15 22:10 (UTC)
@godeater
Try to remove
/home/bryan/source/aur/ytt/src/ytt-0.48.0
directory or, if/home/bryan/source/aur/ytt
is a git repo, rungit clean -fdx
to clean up the working copy.I have just tested the build in a container — no errors were observed.
godeater commented on 2024-02-12 22:13 (UTC)
makepkg won't build 0.48.0-1 for me, it's failing on the first 'go fmt' complaining that there are no "no Go files in <aur source>/ytt/src/ytt-0.48.0"
Zebradil commented on 2023-12-12 12:09 (UTC)
Hey @gtsiam, thanks for giving me access. I have integrated ytt into the automation repo. Here is the source.
Please, check if everything is fine with the generated PKGBUILD, it has already been pushed to AUR.
Meanwhile, I'll configure automation for
kapp
.Then I'll think about what to do with the
carvel-tools
package. I completely agree with your points on it.gtsiam commented on 2023-12-07 16:56 (UTC) (edited on 2023-12-07 17:01 (UTC) by gtsiam)
@Zebradil Sorry, I forgot to turn on notifications for this package when I took it over.
I'd be happy to make you a co-maintainer for
ytt
andkapp
- in fact I just did. So feel free to configure automatic updates for them - I'll keep an eye on your automation repo.As for
carvel-tools
: It should be a group (which I don't think is possible in the aur), or a meta package. My main issue with it currently is that it:Conflicts with
ytt
/ytt-bin
packages.Is a binary package without the
-bin
extensionIt's version is nonsensical.
If I where you I'd make
carvel-tools
depend onytt
and the rest, plus maybe make a separatecarvel-tools-bin
meta package for the binary variants (Though honestly I'd probably just completely forego the meta packages from the start).Zebradil commented on 2023-11-14 23:01 (UTC)
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/carvel-tools/ maintainer here.
The only reason for
carvel-tools
existed was a mixture of outdated bin and source packages. I wanted to have packages for all the tools maintained in the same way.I have adopted all the separate bin packages for carvel tools and built automation to keep them up-to-date (
carvel-tools
is updated in the same way).Now I'm working on automation for several source packages I adopted or created lately (only
kapp
andytt
are not on the list).Here is the repo with all the automation: https://github.com/Zebradil/AUR/
@gtsiam If you like, we can work together on this. I can create a separate repo on GitHub and add you there. Or you can make a co-maintainer of the
ytt
andkapp
packages here in AUR so that I just configure automatic updates for them. Alternatives ideas are welcome, any feedback is appreciated :-)gtsiam commented on 2023-11-13 20:47 (UTC)
Updated to 0.46.0. Note I will keep updating this and https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/kapp for the foreseeable future.
carvel-tools should probably be broken up into ytt-bin, kapp-bin, kctrl-bin, etc, but that is for another time. It does, however, highlight the difference between the two packages: Namely that carvel-tools is a binary-only package.
jfchevrette commented on 2021-03-18 12:52 (UTC)
Thanks for the repo JCaesar. I unfortunately do not use ytt (or related tools) anymore. The packages have since moved to a different github org and the repos have been renamed. I could keep maintaining this packagge but at this point I believe the better option is to use https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/carvel-tools/ which appears to be better maintained and contains all the related tools in one package.
jcaesar commented on 2021-03-18 01:25 (UTC)
Is it possible that the hash for 0.30.0 changed? I'm seeing 5c30b87f5c1a046bc1711242d20cd38c1a835266b22cce83c2f414f88ef33354 on my machines.
Also, the sha256sum in .SRCINFO doesn't match that in PKGBUILD...?
jfchevrette commented on 2019-06-28 13:46 (UTC)
updated to v0.13.0 and added website assets