Package Details: yturl 2.0.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/yturl.git (read-only)
Package Base: yturl
Description: YouTube videos on the command line
Upstream URL: http://github.com/cdown/yturl
Keywords: flash youtube
Licenses: Public Domain
Submitter: cdown
Maintainer: cdown
Last Packager: cdown
Votes: 3
Popularity: 0.119032
First Submitted: 2013-04-08 13:16
Last Updated: 2016-04-22 05:53

Latest Comments

jangler commented on 2015-05-29 12:25

==> Validating source files with md5sums...
v1.16.zip ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

cdown commented on 2013-04-09 00:01

What the web cache from the 25th March says is irrelevant, I took ownership of the package only a little under two days ago in preparation for the 1.13.0 release. I'm sure anyone with AUR logs can verify that I was the maintainer of the yturl package at the time that e-mail was sent. I also received an e-mail about yturl being deleted, so I was obviously the maintainer at that time.

Subject: AUR Package deleted: yturl
Reply-to: nobody@archlinux.org
From: aur-notify@archlinux.org
X-Mailer: AUR
Message-Id: <20130408130216.8FCD4238A9@alderaan.archlinux.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:02:16 +0000 (UTC)

As for it being flagged out of date, that's because *it was*. This package was on a very old version of yturl which was out of date. I decided I would fix and remaintain starting 1.13.0.

If you wish to continue this discussion, let's please do so over e-mail and not pollute the package comments.

cdown commented on 2013-04-08 23:45

What the web cache from the 25th March says is irrelevant, I took ownership of the package only a little under two days ago in preparation for the 1.13.0 release. I'm sure anyone with AUR logs can verify that I was the maintainer of the yturl package at the time that e-mail was sent. I also received an e-mail about yturl being deleted, so I was obviously the maintainer at that time.

Subject: AUR Package deleted: yturl
Reply-to: nobody@archlinux.org
From: aur-notify@archlinux.org
X-Mailer: AUR
Message-Id: <20130408130216.8FCD4238A9@alderaan.archlinux.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:02:16 +0000 (UTC)

As for it being flagged out of date, that's because *it was*. This package was on a very old version of yturl which was out of date. I decided I would fix and remaintain starting 1.13.0.

cdown commented on 2013-04-08 23:43

For the record: if I wasn't the maintainer, why did I get an e-mail that my package was deleted?

To: undisclosed-recipients: ;
Subject: AUR Package deleted: yturl
Reply-to: nobody@archlinux.org
From: aur-notify@archlinux.org
X-Mailer: AUR
Message-Id: <20130408130216.8FCD4238A9@alderaan.archlinux.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Apr 2013 13:02:16 +0000 (UTC)

cdown commented on 2013-04-08 23:42

What the web cache from the 25th March says is irrelevant, I took ownership of the package only a little under two days ago in preparation for the 1.13.0 release. I'm sure anyone with AUR logs can verify that I was the maintainer of the yturl package at the time that e-mail was sent.

As for it being flagged out of date, that's because *it was*. This package was on a very old version of yturl which was out of date. I decided I would fix and remaintain starting 1.13.0.

TrialnError commented on 2013-04-08 19:18

The package was orphaned and had no maintainer and was flagged ood.[0]
Latest maintainer left a comment about that and this comment can now be found in yturl-git.
You didn't take the maintainer role back, so you shouldn't accuse people because of the merge :). As it looked it was not used anymore (replaced by yturl-git)
I'm sorry for the inconvience (as I made the merge request because of the above reasons), but I saw it that way and others too. If not, the merge wouldn't have happened

[0]https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?hl=de&biw=&bih=&q=cache:rwjMKHyLfeoJ:https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/yturl/%3Fsetlang%3Dde%2Byturl+site:aur.archlinux.org&gbv=1&ct=clnk Google Cache of 2013.3.25 Yturl source dead, ood, orphaned http://www.xup.in/dl,97186386/yturl.png/

TrialnError commented on 2013-04-08 18:32

The package was orphaned and had no maintainer and was flagged ood.
Latest maintainer left a comment about that and this comment can now be found in yturl-git.
You didn't take the maintainer role back, so you shouldn't accuse people because of the merge :). As it looked it was not used anymore (replaced by yturl-git)
I'm sorry for the inconvience (as I made the merge request because of the above reasons), but I saw it that way and others too. If not, the merge wouldn't have happened

TrialnError commented on 2013-04-08 18:31

The package was orphaned and had no maintainer and was flagged ood.
Latest maintainer left a comment about that and this comment can now be found in yturl-git.
You didn't take the maintainer role back, so you shouldn't accuse people because of the merge :). As it looked it was not used anymore (replaced by yturl-git)
I'm sorry for the inconvience (as I made the merge request because of the above reasons), but I saw it that way

cdown commented on 2013-04-08 16:48

@TrialnError It was merged incorrectly and indiscriminately without contacting me. Nobody asked me, nor bothered to check the difference between the packages before merging. The two packages are not equivalent and this package is not deprecated. See https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-April/023046.html -- for some unknown reason this was requested to be merged into yturl-git when I neither requested, desired, or knew of any reason for that to occur, and this merge was then carried out without contacting me.

Either way, it's back now. I just wish people would take the time to merge packages properly (by contacting the maintainer, or otherwise what are they even there for).

cdown commented on 2013-04-08 16:45

@TrialnError It was merged incorrectly and indiscriminately without contacting me. Nobody asked me, nor bothered to check the difference between the packages before merging. See https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-April/023046.html

TrialnError commented on 2013-04-08 16:41

Funny.. yturl version packages got abandoned in favor of git-pkgbuild and no one took maintainership. Hardly merged and it's back again :)