Package Details: zfs-linux-lts 2.3.3_6.12.36.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/zfs-linux-lts.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: zfs-linux-lts
Description: Kernel modules for the Zettabyte File System.
Upstream URL: https://openzfs.org/
Licenses: CDDL-1.0
Groups: archzfs-linux-lts
Conflicts: spl-dkms, spl-dkms-git, spl-linux-lts, zfs-dkms, zfs-dkms-git, zfs-dkms-rc, zfs-linux-lts-git, zfs-linux-lts-rc
Provides: spl, zfs
Replaces: spl-linux-lts
Submitter: demizer
Maintainer: gromit
Last Packager: gromit
Votes: 81
Popularity: 0.59
First Submitted: 2016-04-24 19:05 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-07-06 20:05 (UTC)

Required by (19)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 13 Next › Last »

air-g4p commented on 2025-06-23 09:23 (UTC)

@gromit - Thank you for re-updating the PKGBUILD.

I wish I had the available bandwidth to help you co-maintain this package, but I simply do not.

You are doing a terrific job, especially given the frequent number of upstream changes - and I truly appreciate your efforts!

Cheers

gromit commented on 2025-06-23 08:31 (UTC)

Yes I already saw it and just forgot to push my changes as I tested them on my NAS before pushing :)

As you seem to comment quite frequently and also use the package, are you interested to co-maintain it?

air-g4p commented on 2025-06-23 08:19 (UTC)

@gromit - hope you had a fantastic vacation and thanks for upgrading the PKGBUILD!

As the ZFS Gods would have it zfs-utils got upgraded to 2.3.3-1 only one day after the current PKGBUILD was published.

For those interested in running the latest zfs-utils and zfs-linux-lts, several changes are required.

Here's the sequence that worked for me:

https://bpa.st/AC4A

Cheers

gromit commented on 2025-06-01 10:38 (UTC)

I'm sure gromit will update the PKGBIULD when he has the time.

Yeah sorry I just returned from vacation :)

air-g4p commented on 2025-05-30 12:31 (UTC)

It's only been a day since 6.12.31-1-lts was released. I'm sure gromit will update the PKGBIULD when he has the time.

However, if you cannot afford to wait, upgrading is trivial. Modify the PKGBUILD, substituting each reference to 30 with 31 and rebuild it,

Cheers

jokesterfr commented on 2025-05-21 12:51 (UTC)

@air-g4p thank you! My concern was about losing the continuity of service of ZFS. I guess with your suggestion the risk is reduced to an unlucky power failure in the middle of the upgrade process. Mitigated with an inverter. In the end if re-compilation is often needed I found out the package zfs-dkms can be more convenient.

air-g4p commented on 2025-05-10 07:33 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-10 07:34 (UTC) by air-g4p)

@jokesterfr - Did you try gromit's recommended method (below) of building zfs-linux-lts in a clean chroot, first?

In any event, this sequence works on my end:

1.  pacman -Rsc linux-lts linux-lts-headers
2.  pacman -Syu
3.  pacman -S linux-lts linux-lts-headers
4.  git clone https://aur.archlinux.org/zfs-linux-lts.git
5.  cd zfs-linux-lts
6.  time makepkg -sric

Cheers

jokesterfr commented on 2025-05-07 20:24 (UTC)

I read the arch doc about zfs, and got the point: zfs in not upstream in linux, thus only available with strict kernel versions.

I'm strugling with a dumb upgrade issue:

$ yay -Su linux-lts
:: 3 packages to upgrade/install.
3  core/linux-lts          6.12.26-1         -> 6.12.27-1
2  core/linux-lts-headers  6.12.26-1         -> 6.12.27-1
1  aur/zfs-linux-lts       2.3.2_6.12.26.1-1 -> 2.3.2_6.12.27.1-1
...
:: installing linux-lts (6.12.27-1) breaks dependency 'linux-lts=6.12.26-1' required by zfs-linux-lts
 -> error installing repo packages

It seems like a cyclic dependency issue: the new zfs-linux-lts depends on a new specific kernel, this kernel is available but won't upgrade as this would break the current zfs-linux-lts.

Do not hesitate to RTFM me - I cannot find my way. Thank you

clarfonthey commented on 2025-05-07 13:00 (UTC)

In case you're interested, I managed to update zfs-linux-hardened so that it has a pkgver function which automatically selects the latest kernel version if available. Since the package will just fail to build for an unsupported kernel, this seems like a moderate improvement for people who are waiting on a package update for a new minor kernel version.

You're welcome to incorporate those changes into this package, considering how this isn't automatically updated by archzfs any more, but I also understand not wanting to incorporate such a change.

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 13 Next › Last »