Package Details: zfs-linux 2.3.2_6.14.10.arch1.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/zfs-linux.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: zfs-linux
Description: Kernel modules for the Zettabyte File System.
Upstream URL: https://openzfs.org/
Keywords: kernel linux openzfs zfs
Licenses: CDDL
Groups: archzfs-linux
Conflicts: spl-dkms, spl-dkms-git, spl-linux, zfs-dkms, zfs-dkms-git, zfs-dkms-rc, zfs-linux-git, zfs-linux-rc
Provides: spl, zfs
Replaces: spl-linux
Submitter: demizer
Maintainer: lightdot
Last Packager: lightdot
Votes: 276
Popularity: 0.71
First Submitted: 2016-04-21 08:45 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-06-06 15:30 (UTC)

Required by (19)

Sources (1)

Pinned Comments

lightdot commented on 2025-02-04 21:19 (UTC) (edited on 2025-06-03 14:04 (UTC) by lightdot)

This package will be kept in sync with the latest openzfs stable release and the kernels officially supported by it.

For the supported kernel versions, refer to the respective openzfs release notes (LINK).

E.g. openzfs 2.3.2 supports kernel versions 4.18 - 6.14. When kernel 6.15 is released for Arch, zfs-linux will not be updated until the openzfs project announces that it's compatible. This will most likely happen with the next openzfs release.

Kernel compatibility of the upcoming openzfs release can be seen in their META file (LINK).

For those wishing to use openzfs with unsupported kernels, do note that this could lead to serious issues, including data loss, even though such a zfs-linux package might build and install cleanly. Have reliable backups and use such a package at your peril.

Please do not mark this package as out of date without checking the kernel compatibility first. Thank you!

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 .. 79 Next › Last »

ezzetabi commented on 2013-05-03 15:15 (UTC)

Linux 3.8.11 is out.

proxypoke commented on 2013-05-03 15:01 (UTC)

100% installation including boot doesn't work, to my knowledge. You need a separate /boot. The rest, however, does work - I've done it - but it's very brittle, and really not worth the trouble IMO. Though, it's been a while since I've migrated back to ext4 for / and /home, so this might have changed. Go ahead and try, I'd love some new data on this.

demizer commented on 2013-05-02 15:21 (UTC)

@ezzetabi, the archiso repo has been updated. Sorry it took longer than I had expected.

ezzetabi commented on 2013-05-02 09:47 (UTC)

100% installation might be a problem. But there are no problems if you keep /boot (and /boot/efi, if applicable) in a separate partition. Read the wiki about how-to, seek for `zfs'

jnbek commented on 2013-05-01 19:51 (UTC)

I wonder how hard a 100% ZFS Arch Install would be..... Is there a ZFS forum post?

ezzetabi commented on 2013-05-01 17:55 (UTC)

The AUR package is actually up-to-date, but the repository http://demizerone.com/demz-repo-archiso/x86_64/ still has version 0.6.1_3.8.4-1 .

ezzetabi commented on 2013-04-30 12:17 (UTC)

Sorry, I flagged by my mistake. I did not notice the repo has changed...

demizer commented on 2013-04-28 00:15 (UTC)

@foolosophy, you will have to delete the specified files.