Package Details: zig-dev-bin 1:0.12.0_dev.3433.g640acf862-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/zig-dev-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: zig-dev-bin
Description: A general-purpose programming language and toolchain for maintaining robust, optimal, and reusable software
Upstream URL: https://ziglang.org/
Keywords: zig
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: zig
Provides: zig
Submitter: zhangkaizhao
Maintainer: Techcable (junckes)
Last Packager: Techcable
Votes: 17
Popularity: 0.26
First Submitted: 2020-09-20 08:29 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-03-24 07:50 (UTC)

Dependencies (4)

Required by (77)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

impulse commented on 2024-07-06 08:35 (UTC)

@Techcable i think its out of date, but as i did not get a response addressing my question, i have decided to make my own package which aims to support more architectures in the near future: zig-nightly-bin.

Feel free to take any ideas from it to improve your version. :)

Techcable commented on 2024-06-29 00:48 (UTC)

@impulse

Is the package actually out of date or just flagged that way?

It should automatically update.

impulse commented on 2024-06-19 09:42 (UTC)

can you add me as co-maintainer? i want to keep this uptodate.

anagram3k commented on 2023-07-06 21:41 (UTC) (edited on 2023-07-06 21:44 (UTC) by anagram3k)

The messages about "local (...) is newer than AUR" are happening because the PKGBUILD always gets the last version on the Ziglang website and the AUR database uses the version information contained in the .SRCINFO file.

The only way to make this go away is by updating SRCINFO every time there is a new version on the site, but I don't think it is worth all the trouble. Just reinstall when you want to update the package.

EDIT: Maybe you should put a message saying "Because the new versions of the zig-lang-dev are released very frequently, is common to see the message informing the version you have installed is newer than the version on AUR" or something like that.

Techcable commented on 2023-06-26 07:28 (UTC)

I can not reproduce the issues people are having building the latest versions.

However, I've bumped the version to 0.11.0_dev.3803+7ad104227 in case that helps.

jinzhongjia commented on 2023-04-13 18:22 (UTC)

If someone encounters a situation where the update detection does not have a new version, please delete the package and reinstall

Zdrobot commented on 2023-02-13 09:14 (UTC)

Getting this error when trying to install the package (removed it so that it installs the latest dev build when installing again):

Downloading Zig 0.11.0_dev.1606+3c2a43fdc from https://ziglang.org/builds/zig-linux-x86_64-0.11.0-dev.1606+3c2a43fdc.tar.xz
Downloading signature...

ERROR: Expected hash b7d30629a1883f177aa9a61b053d64b2d6d8c42cb113c830e531a4952fcd61a4 for zig-linux-x86_64-0.11.0_dev.1606+3c2a43fdc.tar.xz, but got f5bc0678c20779fad0c5cd3ddcf69acba80fe0453844634a69da8097acba9224
 -> error making: zig-dev-bin

Zdrobot commented on 2023-01-21 05:47 (UTC)

Unfortunately, the package is still not updating Zig. Instead, I get this message (from yay):

-> zig-dev-bin: local (1:0.11.0_dev.1366+c70a3d902-1) is newer than AUR (1:0.11.0_dev.1364+72c09b7b3-1)

Still have to remove the package, then install again, to update to the latest Zig dev build.

Techcable commented on 2023-01-19 07:06 (UTC)

Hi!

Zig has started signing the built binaries with minisign signatures.

I've updated this package to verify these signatures.

A lot of these recent errors seems to be due to missing checksums. For a while after adding the minisign signatures, Zig removed the SHA checksums. They recently added the checksums back in, so I suspect the error will be resolved.

1 2 3 Next › Last »