Search Criteria
Package Details: zluda 2-3
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/zluda.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | zluda |
| Description: | A drop-in replacement for CUDA on Intel Skylake/Gen9 or newer GPUs |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA/ |
| Licenses: | MIT, Apache |
| Conflicts: | nvidia-utils |
| Submitter: | dbermond |
| Maintainer: | dbermond |
| Last Packager: | dbermond |
| Votes: | 6 |
| Popularity: | 1.25 |
| First Submitted: | 2021-02-22 23:31 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2022-11-14 10:58 (UTC) |
Dependencies (6)
- level-zero-loader (level-zero-loader-gitAUR)
- opencl-icd-loader (khronos-ocl-icd-gitAUR, khronos-ocl-icdAUR, ocl-icd)
- git (git-gitAUR) (make)
- level-zero-headers (level-zero-headers-gitAUR) (make)
- opencl-headers (opencl-headers-gitAUR) (make)
- rust (rust-nightlyAUR, rust-nightly-binAUR, rust-gitAUR, rustup-gitAUR, rustup) (make)
Latest Comments
drws commented on 2024-03-20 22:06 (UTC)
I thought of
zluda2before but it might interfere with mainline v2 in the future. Anyway, regarding the new version there seems to be an active fork:https://github.com/lshqqytiger/ZLUDA
dbermond commented on 2024-03-18 22:53 (UTC)
@drws splitting a package into different versions of the same upstream software should be avoided, as different versions usually requires totally different maintenance actions. Instead, a different package should be created for each desired version. See versioned packages in the official repositories (for example, gcc, llvm, etc). And the package should not be named 'zluda-intel' IMHO, but 'zluda2' to reflect the version, with the target hardware being explained in pkgdesc. Besides, I have found no reasonable/acceptable way to build version 3 here, since it depends on outdated/unsupported rocm.
drws commented on 2024-03-18 16:23 (UTC)
It would probably be best if the current PKGBUILD was split off into
zluda-intelpackage (v2) and this one updated to v3.dbermond commented on 2024-02-26 15:10 (UTC)
@RAMChYLD Theoretically yes. But the upstream developer clearly states that the current state of the project is now abandoned. So I think this is not probable in the near future.
RAMChYLD commented on 2024-02-20 14:28 (UTC)
Since the code is now open-source, is it possible to make upstream reinstate support for Intel so it works with both AMD and Intel GPUs?
dbermond commented on 2024-02-13 14:21 (UTC)
@compiler1413 Yes, upstream dropped support for Intel GPUs in the latest version and now offers support only for AMD GPUs.
compiler1413 commented on 2024-02-12 16:28 (UTC)
https://github.com/vosen/ZLUDA/releases/tag/v3 v3 is released and Intel support was dropped? It's CUDA for AMD gpus only now I think
dbermond commented on 2023-06-20 23:53 (UTC)
@dreieck Sorry, but I could not understand what you mean. This package does not provide any other software that already exists, so there is nothing to be placed in the provides array. What do you suggest to be placed in the provides array?
dreieck commented on 2023-06-01 10:48 (UTC)
When it is a drop-in replacement, I think something should be added to the
providesarray (i.e. that stuff that it really replaces in a drop-in fashion).