Package Details: znc-clientbuffer-git r37.7ae14f8-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: znc-clientbuffer-git
Description: ZNC module for client specific buffers
Upstream URL:
Licenses: Apache
Submitter: arcnmx
Maintainer: arcnmx
Last Packager: arcnmx
Votes: 4
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2016-08-11 18:08 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2018-05-18 22:39 (UTC)

Dependencies (4)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

aphirst commented on 2018-05-22 21:14 (UTC)

Build issue is fixed upstream in znc.

aphirst commented on 2018-05-22 10:28 (UTC)

I can confirm that the issue IS upstream:

[alarm@alarm ~]$ cat /usr/bin/znc-buildmod | grep distcc '-DCMAKE_C_COMPILER=/usr/lib/distcc/bin/cc', '-DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER=/usr/lib/distcc/bin/c++',

Editing these lines in znc-buildmod to simply point to /usr/bin/cc and /usr/bin/c++ fixes the issue. It seems that the Archlinux ARM "znc" package is being build using distcc, and that the znc developers figured it was a good idea to hardcode the build machine's compiler into the output znc-buildmod, even though there's no reason to assume that the settings will be valid.

aphirst commented on 2018-05-21 13:39 (UTC) (edited on 2018-05-21 13:39 (UTC) by aphirst)

I think the issue is upstream, as such I've reported it there.

aphirst commented on 2018-05-20 23:34 (UTC)

I've just started getting build problems:

Cmake seems to be very confused, trying distcc, even though distcc isn't even installed, and is !'ed out in makepkg.conf. I get this when building with aurutils or via makepkg manually.

arcnmx commented on 2018-05-18 22:27 (UTC)

Is there a standard set of dependencies that should be used for znc-buildmod? A casual glance looks like it'd be python, znc, and cmake?

prg commented on 2018-05-18 14:57 (UTC)

cmake should be added as build dep

S13ntist commented on 2018-04-23 20:28 (UTC)

Git needs to be added as a make dep. Else this fails to build in a clean chroot

arcnmx commented on 2017-10-10 15:38 (UTC)

Updated to use the newer fork. If CyberShadow wants to comment here requesting that I transfer ownership I can do that (is that even a thing or do I just disown it?)

aphirst commented on 2017-10-10 06:58 (UTC)

It seems that CyberShadow's repo is now actually considered the "official" one.

S13ntist commented on 2017-10-08 09:45 (UTC)

Apparently jpnurmi abandoned the project (or at least has been inactive for a long while now regarding this repo, on github and on irc) CyberShadow did a fork, which is now also the repo mentioned on the znc-wiki (, in which they implemented lots of new functionality and improvements. Would you mind updating the source origin? The new repo would be CyberShadow would also be interested to accept ownership of this package if you are so inclined, as he is also on Arch