Search Criteria
Package Details: zpaq 7.15-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/zpaq.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | zpaq |
Description: | Programmable file compressor, library and utilities. Based on the PAQ compression algorithm |
Upstream URL: | http://mattmahoney.net/dc/zpaq.html |
Licenses: | custom, MIT |
Submitter: | Ereski |
Maintainer: | Ereski |
Last Packager: | Ereski |
Votes: | 59 |
Popularity: | 0.40 |
First Submitted: | 2015-08-15 15:07 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-09-05 18:17 (UTC) |
Required by (3)
- peazip-gtk2-bin (optional)
- peazip-qt-bin (optional)
- zpipe
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
FabioLolix commented on 2024-07-22 23:09 (UTC)
Packages of
base-devel
package don't have to be specifed inmakedepends
, they can be in depends if needed to run the program (I add stuff like glibc, gcc-libs to suppress the namcap warning; several Arch packagers does that too)In makedepends only what is needed at build time (i.e. git, cmake, headers), some stuff can be both in makedepends and optdepends (for not mandatory optional features)
In checkdepends only what is needed in
check()
in the pkgbuildfcorbelli commented on 2024-07-22 23:01 (UTC)
Beginner's question on Arch. How are dependencies enumerated, and by whom (/what)? From depends and makedepends?
Ereski commented on 2024-07-22 12:04 (UTC)
@xiota pod2man is part of perl, which is is part of the
base-devel
group. See https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR#Prerequisites.As for the URL, it will stay pointing to the official website. That GitHub repo is maintained by a third party.
fcorbelli commented on 2023-09-14 12:42 (UTC)
Short version: I will put my AUR for zpaqfranz, different from zpaq's. Or at least I will try
Ereski commented on 2023-09-14 12:34 (UTC)
@fcorbelli anyone can create AUR packages, see here: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/AUR_submission_guidelines. Since you literally are the creator of zpaqfranz I don't see how it could ever be "rude" for you to maintain your AUR package for zpaqfranz. Feel free to use the PKGBUILD here as a starting point.
But as I understand you'd like to make this package switch to your fork? Your phrasing is a bit confusing but if that is indeed the case then the answer is no.
fcorbelli commented on 2023-09-14 12:01 (UTC)
@FabioLolix I know, it's my thread, but the question is a little different. Making an "official" package (for pacman) seems very difficult, while one for AUR much simpler (materially they are identical, but on AUR there is self-production) So I was asking if it is considered rude in the arch community to appropriate a AUR PKGBUILD to make your own
FabioLolix commented on 2023-09-12 17:41 (UTC)
@fcorbelli pkgbuild for zpaqfranz was discussed here with you https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2029754#p2029754
1 2 3 Next › Last »