Package Details: zrepl-bin 0.6.1-4

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: zrepl-bin
Description: One-stop ZFS backup & replication solution
Upstream URL:
Keywords: zfs zrepl
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: zrepl
Provides: zrepl
Submitter: johnramsden
Maintainer: johnramsden
Last Packager: johnramsden
Votes: 3
Popularity: 0.050850
First Submitted: 2019-06-07 02:41 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-10-15 20:00 (UTC)

Dependencies (0)

Required by (0)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

TPXP commented on 2023-12-29 22:12 (UTC) (edited on 2023-12-29 22:13 (UTC) by TPXP)

Hello, could you add sources for all built architectures, for users of ArchLinuxARM and ArchLinux32? All that's needed is to update the arch, source and sha256sums fields to download the right binary for every architecture

arch=('x86_64' 'aarch64' 'armv7h' 'i486' 'i686' 'pentium4')

Thanks in advance :)

darkbasic commented on 2023-10-17 19:54 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-17 19:54 (UTC) by darkbasic)

I had to re-download it and now it works, apparently the github file changed.

johnramsden commented on 2023-10-17 19:40 (UTC)

@darkbasic Which hash is wrong for you? They appear to be correct for me when I use both updpkgsums, and manual sha256sum. Are you using the most recent patch (4)?

sha256sum zrepl-*
263c82501b75a1413f8a298c1d67d7e940c1b0cb967979790773237e2a30adbd  zrepl-0.6.1
0ac6e35666e32cd3b7b1e047836e45f60718b7ecc55e475b5b1f8dbd01e5ae7c  zrepl-bin-0.6.1

darkbasic commented on 2023-10-17 07:58 (UTC)

Checksum is incorrect.

Sophon96 commented on 2023-10-15 19:50 (UTC)

Looks like the checksum in the PKGBUILD is incorrect. The downloaded source for me has the correct SHA512 hash (6193c889294214735e329179a31e6446804181951a863b9deb8132be83e48ae5581a13431bd5fe14f0d2b84bdbc7a4cfca71717f5b8d2203110b7a573fa12a45) and a SHA256 hash of 0ac6e35666e32cd3b7b1e047836e45f60718b7ecc55e475b5b1f8dbd01e5ae7c.

artodeto commented on 2023-10-13 13:39 (UTC)

Hey, I still get an sha256sum error.

zrepl-bin - exit status 1

I've cleared my package cache already :-/

johnramsden commented on 2023-10-02 07:30 (UTC)

Sorry, try now

darkbasic commented on 2023-10-02 07:05 (UTC)

==> Retrieving sources... -> Found zrepl-0.6.1 -> Found zrepl-bin ==> Validating source files with sha256sums... zrepl-0.6.1 ... Passed zrepl-bin ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

Sophon96 commented on 2023-06-09 17:40 (UTC)

The solution for me was to simply delete the zrepl-bin file; because the updated source file has the same name as the old one (both are zrepl-bin), makepkg doesn't redownload the source file, so it tries to build with the outdated binary, which promptly fails the integrity check. I'm not familiar with AUR packaging, but I assume you could append the version to the end of the source name to avoid this.

johnramsden commented on 2022-11-08 01:15 (UTC)

@Dracul @Beneter there was an issue with the original package which I think I have fixed now. Let me know if it works for you.