Running "makepkg-g" always gives me this value:
md5sums = ('3671e8123fe69dc7d13f81ed9d768b14')
I put it in PKGBUILD and all ok
Search Criteria
Package Base Details: backintime
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/backintime.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Submitter: | None |
| Maintainer: | graysky |
| Last Packager: | graysky |
| Votes: | 298 |
| Popularity: | 0.28 |
| First Submitted: | 2009-01-09 20:46 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-02-03 12:23 (UTC) |
Packages (2)
ValHue commented on 2013-04-04 07:59 (UTC)
fukawi2 commented on 2013-04-03 22:22 (UTC)
OK, it appears Launchpad gives a slightly different tarball each time you download, so the md5sums are always going to fail.
Anyone know how to deal with that?
fukawi2 commented on 2013-04-03 22:11 (UTC)
Well it appears upstream have adopted the Ubuntu fork, so here's a new PKGBUILD for 1.0.22 :)
kar commented on 2013-02-12 01:23 (UTC)
Ok, I think it's not really necessary, because version 1.0.8 (I use the KDE4 version) is very stable and for me it runs, runs, runs and runs. ;-)
But I don't know, if there are some new features or if it's only for stability- and security-updates.
fukawi2 commented on 2013-02-11 22:45 (UTC)
It seems Ubuntu have forked BIT since upstream dev seems to have come to a halt. I'm unsure if we should switch to track the Ubuntu version or not...
kar commented on 2013-02-11 15:09 (UTC)
I'm not sure, but I think the package is (maybe) outdated?!
On the website http://backintime.le-web.org/download_page/ is only version 1.0.8 available, but on Launchpad ( https://launchpad.net/~bit-team/+archive/stable ) is for Ubuntu version 1.0.20 available.
fukawi2 commented on 2013-01-01 06:28 (UTC)
@coderkun Because I'm not a TU, and obviously none of the current TU's have an interest in picking it up.
coderkun commented on 2012-12-31 12:05 (UTC)
Why is BackInTime not in the official repos?—all dependencies are.
capoeira commented on 2012-11-04 08:44 (UTC)
anybody got backups working with a systemd timer (without cron)?
fukawi2 commented on 2012-10-28 22:14 (UTC)
Added in pkgrel 5
https://github.com/fukawi2/aur-packages/commit/06212232a9e16e1de323218fa1e5a51508e45293
Pinned Comments
graysky commented on 2023-10-07 12:15 (UTC)
Using an AUR helper such as yay to build packages including backintime is HIGHLY discouraged. The recommended build method is to use a clean chroot. See: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_clean_chroot
I wrote a script that automates much of that called clean-chroot-manager offered here in the AUR.
Please stop posting build failures because you insist on building with yay or other AUR helpers.