@graysky, no problem, thanks for keeping this package up to date!
Search Criteria
Package Base Details: backintime
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/backintime.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Submitter: | None |
Maintainer: | graysky |
Last Packager: | graysky |
Votes: | 298 |
Popularity: | 0.29 |
First Submitted: | 2009-01-09 20:46 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-02-03 12:23 (UTC) |
Packages (2)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 70 Next › Last »
spsf64 commented on 2023-09-18 21:04 (UTC)
graysky commented on 2023-09-18 19:13 (UTC)
Fixed, thanks @spsf64
spsf64 commented on 2023-09-18 12:32 (UTC)
1.4.0-3 won't build (-2 was ok).
Starting prepare()... patching file CHANGES Hunk #1 FAILED at 1. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file CHANGES.rej patching file qt/app.py ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare().
graysky commented on 2023-09-18 07:57 (UTC)
@dev_aryoda - It's not a problem. I updated the pkg to 1.4.0-3.
dev_aryoda commented on 2023-09-18 06:09 (UTC)
Aside from the unit tests failing
@hollunder Could you please show me the failing unit test(s) here once the checksum is corrected? I need at least the actual/expected output of the failing unit test + the code line number. THX!
dev_aryoda commented on 2023-09-17 23:13 (UTC)
@hollunder
Aside from the unit tests failing I get, after a fresh download, a checksum failure: pr1536.patch ... FAILED
We (= the BiT developers) have added another commit to the BiT pull request to include a CHANGELOG entry and this seems to have changed the checksum since the patch takes the diff of the full PR.
@graysky Sorry for that, we didn't realize that impact. We will keep the PR stable now (no more commits)
hollunder commented on 2023-09-17 23:08 (UTC)
Aside from the unit tests failing I get, after a fresh download, a checksum failure: pr1536.patch ... FAILED
graysky commented on 2023-09-16 10:54 (UTC)
@dev_aryoda - https://github.com/bit-team/backintime/issues/1535
graysky commented on 2023-09-16 10:54 (UTC)
@buhtz - some TU has to want to adopt it.
buhtz commented on 2023-09-15 08:27 (UTC)
Hello Graysky,
I learned that AUR packages can move into official Arch repo based on votes. Your package does have nearly 300 votes. So do you see a way to get it into the offical repos?
Kind Christian
Pinned Comments
graysky commented on 2023-10-07 12:15 (UTC)
Using an AUR helper such as yay to build packages including backintime is HIGHLY discouraged. The recommended build method is to use a clean chroot. See: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_clean_chroot
I wrote a script that automates much of that called clean-chroot-manager offered here in the AUR.
Please stop posting build failures because you insist on building with yay or other AUR helpers.