Arch Linux User Repository

Search Criteria

Enter search criteria

Search by

Keywords

Out of Date

Sort by

Sort order

Per page

Package Details: bitwig-studio-legacy 1.3.16-1

Package Actions

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/bitwig-studio-legacy.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	bitwig-studio-legacy
Description:	Digital audio workstation for music production, remixing and live performance
Upstream URL:	https://www.bitwig.com/
Keywords:	audio daw multimedia music
Licenses:	custom
Conflicts:	bitwig-8-track, bitwig-studio
Provides:	bitwig-studio
Submitter:	stylemistake
Maintainer:	stylemistake
Last Packager:	stylemistake
Votes:	4
Popularity:	0.000000
First Submitted:	2017-03-01 00:51 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2017-03-15 18:14 (UTC)

Dependencies (8)

jack^AUR (jack2-git^AUR, pipewire-full-jack-git^AUR, pipewire-jack-git^AUR, jack2, pipewire-jack)
libbsd (libbsd-git^AUR)
xcb-util-wm
xdg-utils (busking-git^AUR, xdg-utils-slock^AUR, mimi^AUR, mimi-git^AUR, xdg-utils-handlr^AUR, opener^AUR, xdg-utils-betterlockscreen^AUR, mimejs-git^AUR, xdg-utils-mimeo^AUR)
zenity (qarma-git^AUR, zenity-gtk3^AUR, zenity-git^AUR)
alsa-lib (optional)
ffmpeg (ffmpeg-intel-full-git^AUR, ffmpeg-nvcodec-11-1-git^AUR, ffmpeg-amd-full^AUR, ffmpeg-ffplayout^AUR, ffmpeg-obs^AUR, ffmpeg-amd-full-git^AUR, ffmpeg-headless^AUR, ffmpeg-libfdk_aac^AUR, ffmpeg-cuda^AUR, ffmpeg-decklink^AUR, ffmpeg-full^AUR, ffmpeg-git^AUR, ffmpeg-full-git^AUR) (optional) – MP3 support
oss^AUR (oss-nonfree^AUR, oss-git^AUR) (optional)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

https://downloads.bitwig.com/stable/1.3.16/bitwig-studio-1.3.16.deb

Latest Comments

Emmatipate commented on 2017-08-19 21:03 (UTC) (edited on 2017-08-19 21:05 (UTC) by Emmatipate)

I had to reinstall xcb-util-wm. Otherwise it complained about "error loading jack package: jack_get_version_string".

jonathon commented on 2017-03-16 11:32 (UTC)

I'd leave it with stable releases; there shouldn't be all too many now (and if anyone wants an RC they can always locally edit the PKGBUILD themselves ;).

stylemistake commented on 2017-03-10 03:37 (UTC)

Do we need to keep this up to date with the current release candidate (which is 1.3.16-rc3), or keep it at the stable branch (1.3.15)? I really don't want to maintain a yet another package, and at the same time updates at RC branch are pretty good.

jonathon commented on 2017-03-01 11:41 (UTC)

This is great for people who don't want to upgrade, can't afford it, or have issues with version 2.0. Thank you!