Arch Linux User Repository

@eimis @theokonos This is not a packaging issue. Either uninstall bubblewrap or build the package in a clean chroot with devtools.

ubuntubang NobodySpecial, You can use --force to deal with this kind of conflict.

ubuntubang - I just manually deleted those conflicting files then it installed fine.

hi folks, I get Targets (1): fontconfig-ubuntu-2.10.1-3 Total Installed Size: 3.56 MiB Net Upgrade Size: -0.11 MiB Proceed with installation? [Y/n] (1/1) checking package integrity [#######################################################] 100% (1/1) loading package files [#######################################################] 100% (1/1) checking for file conflicts [#######################################################] 100% error: failed to commit transaction (conflicting files) fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-antialias.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-hinting-slight.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/10-hinting.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/20-unhint-small-vera.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-metric-aliases.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/30-urw-aliases.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/40-nonlatin.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/45-latin.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/49-sansserif.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/50-user.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/51-local.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/60-latin.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/65-fonts-persian.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/65-nonlatin.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/69-unifont.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/80-delicious.conf exists in filesystem fontconfig-ubuntu: /etc/fonts/conf.d/90-synthetic.conf exists in filesystem Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded. $ ls -l /etc/fonts/conf.d/ lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Mar 24 2012 10-antialias.conf -> ../conf.avail/10-antialias.conf ... $ pacman -Qo /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-antialias.conf /etc/fonts/conf.avail/10-antialias.conf is owned by fontconfig-ubuntu 2.8.0-10

@tevin anti-alising & hinting working again thanks . @NZ_NZ same issue here , but it looks like ttf-dejavu need to be updated

Using fontconfig-ubuntu 2.10.1-3 I got the following warning during installation: Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/53-monospace-lcd-filter.conf", line 10: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected fonts are still ugly in few web sites...

Symbolic links are backed in 2.10.1-3, try update and see if the fonts look better, no much differences for me though.

@hermes14, thanks for your list of conf.d symlinks. I'm not sure why the 2.10 version doesn't take care of that in its fongconfig.install file. 2.8 came with a default set of conf files. Upgrading to 2.10 however broke some of these links and so by default we lost some of our older settings. @maintainer it would be great if you can symlink these files listed by @hermes14 in the install file. Maybe follow an upgrade proof method along the lines of: http://pastebin.com/tYkH95MG

Actually, it's not a good idea to symlink all of the conf files. For instance, auto-hinting and subpixel rendering "are not designed to work together" (quote from wiki), unless you use the infinality patch set. You also have to choose only one of the hint styles (full, medium, slight) and only one of the subpixel rendering specification. Please read https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Font_Configuration @Birkov: I'm not the maintainer, anyway the output means what it says, files already exist, it's harmless and has no special meaning, since it's a command you run yourself. Unless you have a very good reason to overwrite them with ln -sf, just leave it alone. Besides, those files are not from fontconfig-ubuntu package. The 20-* and 57-* are from ttf-dejavu, the other ones possibly from some MS font (just run pacman -Qo on them).

@mihi: Thank you very much. Looks like you fixed it :-) Here some output for the maintainer: for i in `ls ../conf.avail/*` > do > ln -s $i > done ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘./20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans.conf’: File exists ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘./20-unhint-small-dejavu-sans-mono.conf’: File exists ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘./20-unhint-small-dejavu-serif.conf’: File exists ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘./57-dejavu-sans.conf’: File exists ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘./57-dejavu-sans-mono.conf’: File exists ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘./57-dejavu-serif.conf’: File exists ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘./alias.conf’: File exists ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘./local.conf’: File exists ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘./misc.conf’: File exists ln: failed to create symbolic link ‘./msfonts-rules.conf’: File exists